| |
ZL3TDA > SAT 19.01.04 09:12l 22 Lines 737 Bytes #999 (0) @ AMSAT
BID : ZL3TDA373
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: Re: UA9FBV Back to the Moon by 202
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<DB0MW<DB0ROF<DB0ERF<DB0CHZ<DB0ZWI<DB0HOT<OK0PKL<
OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0AR<WB0TAX<VK7AX<ZL2BAU<ZL3VML
Sent: 040119/0738Z @:ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC #:17124 [Chch-NZ] FBB7.00i $:ZL3TDA373
From: ZL3TDA@ZL3VML.#80.NZL.OC
To : SAT@AMSAT
A thought....
>Why should it take more than ten years (from 2004 to 20015 earliest) to get
a >man on the moon again? In the 1960s, it only took eight years from Kennedys
>announcement to the first step on the moon to develope all the technology
from >
>almost nothing.
>And now, with all that knowledge and experience, it should take longer, maybe
>even almost twice the time (2004 to 2020)? Can't they just look up the old
>drawings, build a new, enhanced Apollo, and be back on the moon again?
>
>73, Patrick
Perhaps this reasserts the possibility that man has never been to the moon?
Graham
ZL3TDA.
T4 1.5à23
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
