W4NTI > MISC 25.05.03 19:39l 34 Lines 686 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : BAOR2T$HUD$1
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: PSK and/or MFSK on 2 metres & 70cm?
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0FSG<DB0PV<OE2XOM<OE5XBL<OE3XSR<OK0PBX<OK0PHK<OK0NAG<
9A0BBS<LZ0FBB<IK1ZNW<IK6PYS<LZ3NP<F6CDD<VE2WXK<VA2BBS<VE2PKT
Sent: 030525/1227z @:VE2PKT.#QBC.QC.CAN.NOAM [TNOS2.40*LINUX] $:BAOR2T$HUD$1
Message-Id: BAOR2T$HUD$1
From: gw3tmh@ve2pkt.#qbc.qc.can.noam
To: misc@ww
Seems to me PSK and MFSK are designed to work under just those
conditions.....in fact VHF should be a durn site easier than HF paths.
Dan/W4NTI
"Rene" <deleterene.altena@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:baolc3$1uo1h$1@ID-153362.news.dfncis.de...
> Hello All!
>
> Somebody told me that PSK31 or MFSK is not well suited for communications
or
> weak signal work on 2 metres or 70 centimetres for example because of
phase
> shifting etc. Is there any experience known (max. distance) that could
> provide any clarification on this topic?
>
> Rene
>
>
> --
> ir. Rene Altena MSc IE
> rene.altena@gmx.net
>
>
>
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| 
