| |
EB2DVY > PSK31 11.05.00 01:11l 781 Lines 26514 Bytes #-9568 (0) @ WW.SYD.NSW
BID : 1186-EB2DVY
Read: GUEST
Subj: PSK31 Digest V1 #381
Path: OE1XAB<OE3XPR<OE6XAR<OE5XBL<OE3XSR<OK0PBX<OM0PBM<SR9ZAA<PP5BLU<PY2GN<
PY4BHB<PY3DZZ<KP4IG<EA3RKU<EA5AKC<EA5RKV<EA5DV<EA5RCI<EA5VDR<EA3B<
ED3ZAF<EA2K<EA1URR<EA1URM<EA2RCF<EA2G<EA2URV
Sent: 000508/2158Z @:EA2URV.EABI.ESP.EU #:55695 [URV-ABRA Bilbao] $:1186-EB2DVY
From: EB2DVY@EA2URV.EABI.ESP.EU
To : PSK31@WW.SYD.NSW.AUS.OC
De: Psk31 Digest <owner-psk31@aintel.bi.ehu.es>
Para: <psk31-digest@bipt106.bi.ehu.es>
Asunto: Psk31 Digest V1 #381
Fecha: martes 2 de mayo de 2000 11:04
Psk31 Digest Tuesday, May 2 2000 Volume 01 : Number 381
In this issue:
[psk31] Re: [PSK31] DX'ing with PSK-31 - A more personal mode
[psk31] FT 1000MP DVS-2 Connection
[psk31] FT1000MP DVS-2 Connection
[psk31] Interference
Re: [psk31] Interference
Re: [psk31] Interference
Re: [psk31] Laptops and PSK
RE: [psk31] Interference
[psk31] BX5AA
Re: [psk31] Re: [PSK31] DX'ing with PSK-31 - A more personal mode
Re: [psk31] Re: [PSK31] DX'ing with PSK-31 - A more personal mode
[psk31] PACTOR INTERFERENCE
[psk31] 5X1P and 5R8GB
Re: [psk31] PSK31 Break-in Operation??
[psk31] Clock Setting - Digipan.
[psk31] Digipan and Icom IC-745
Re: [psk31] Clock Setting - Digipan.
RE: [psk31] Clock Setting - Digipan.
Re: [psk31] Digipan and Icom IC-745
Re: [psk31] Clock Setting - Digipan.
RE: [psk31] Clock Setting - Digipan.
[psk31] Re- Clock setting Digipan
[psk31] Automatic stations
Re: [psk31] Digipan and Icom IC-745
RE: [psk31] TS-520SE
RE: [psk31] Automatic stations
Re: [psk31] 6 meter psk31
[psk31] Laptops and PSK31
See the end of the digest for information about psk31-digest
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 08:01:45 EDT
From: W8JOE@aol.com
Subject: [psk31] Re: [PSK31] DX'ing with PSK-31 - A more personal mode
Hello everyone. Just so there is no confusion, I run a FT 1000D, that puts
out about 225 watts, that is why I can crank it up to 100 watts. I would not
do so if I only could put out 100 watts. I agree with everyone in that
respect. Sort of similar to AM. You have to reduce power to 25% of the max
because it jumps up to the max when you transmit. 73, Joe.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 07:50:20 -0500
From: "Bob Hicks" <w5tx@arrl.net>
Subject: [psk31] FT 1000MP DVS-2 Connection
For those who might be interested. I have revised the information on the FT
1000MP connections on my web page. The schematic had the rig input and
output reversed and I have added some control info.
See http://members.home.net/w5tx/psk31/ft1000 or
http://members.home.net/w5tx and click on the appropriate links. Sorry
about the confusion -- it's finally correct and checked out again this
morning!
Bob
w5tx@home.com
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 07:54:26 -0500
From: "Bob Hicks" <w5tx@arrl.net>
Subject: [psk31] FT1000MP DVS-2 Connection
Looked like a mail problem on this end -- if this is repeat please
disregard.
For those who might be interested. I have revised the information on the FT
1000MP connections on my web page. The schematic had the rig input and
output reversed and I have added some control info.
See http://members.home.net/w5tx/psk31/ft1000 or
http://members.home.net/w5tx and click on the appropriate links. Sorry
about the confusion -- it's finally correct and checked out again this
morning!
Bob
w5tx@arrl.net
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 06:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Pete Brunelli <n1qdq@yahoo.com>
Subject: [psk31] Interference
Has anyone noticed that the MBO's seem to respond to PSK31 signals? I don't
think that I am the only one who has noticed a PSK cq get stomped by a pactor
signal. The MBO's come up ON FREQUENCY, and to s PSK31 station that means
that it has picked a 100hz window in which to respond. This is not
conicidence or random chance. I also see this with Hell mode qso's. If this
is real, I believe that it is a very nice piece of leverage against automated
unattended operations on HF.
Pete, N1QDQ
=====
Pete Brunelli - N1QDQ
1.8 - 146Mhz from fn31oo or thereabouts.
http://www.connix.com/~pcb
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 10:43:08 -0400
From: "Bob Lewis" <aa4pb@erols.com>
Subject: Re: [psk31] Interference
> Has anyone noticed that the MBO's seem to respond to
> PSK31 signals
I think it's just that someone you can't hear activated the station.
MBO's respond the their call signs (or selcal in the case of Amtor).
There's no way they could be activated by a PSK signal if they're
using the standard protocols.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 10:55:17 -0400
From: "Dick, N1RCT" <n1rct@megalink.net>
Subject: Re: [psk31] Interference
Interesting ... have also seen it when using RTTY above 14090 and
activating a HF Packet robot
.. (where it is legal, I understand) .. If an auto station responds to signals
other than
legitimate connect requests, it should be above 14088 ... 73
Dick Stevens, N1RCT n1rct@megalink.net
PO Box 1075, Wilton, ME 04294 USA (207) 645-4748
Your RTTY Website: http://www.megalink.net/~n1rct
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 10:11:13 -0500
From: Martin <rutherford.ulea@mcleodusa.net>
Subject: Re: [psk31] Laptops and PSK
Hi Guys. I know that the ESS sound chips used in many laptops should
work with PSK.
Jkn1olo@aol.com wrote:
>
> If its a pentium class processor and has sound you can feel prety confident
> that it will support PSK31. On older 486 machines you'd have to go to the
> manufacturer's site to see if you can find the machine spec's. The most
> important thing is a 16bit soundblaster compatible soundcard.
>
> 73
> John
> N1OLO
>
- --
Cul8r
Martin Campbell rutherford.ulea@mcleodusa.net KB0HAE
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 11:57:13 -0400
From: "Richard B Drake" <rbdrake@erols.com>
Subject: RE: [psk31] Interference
I'm confused. I don't see anything in the FCC regulations that
mentions frequencies like 14088 or 14090 and I am wondering if I
am missing something or if people are confusing IARU/ARRL band
plans with law. The band plans are gentlemen's agreements which
any considerate operator will follow, but they have nothing to do
with law, they are just gentlemen's agreements. If I have missed
something in the actual regulations, please point out where.
Thanks.
- ---
73, Rich - W3ZJ
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-psk31@aintel.bi.ehu.es
> [mailto:owner-psk31@aintel.bi.ehu.es]On Behalf Of Dick, N1RCT
> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 10:55 AM
> To: PSK Reflector
> Subject: Re: [psk31] Interference
>
>
> Interesting ... have also seen it when using RTTY
> above 14090 and activating a HF Packet robot
> .. (where it is legal, I understand) .. If an auto
> station responds to signals other than
> legitimate connect requests, it should be above 14088 ... 73
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 16:55:38 +0100
From: "Carlos C Felicio" <ct1fmy@ip.pt>
Subject: [psk31] BX5AA
Hi
It looks the band is really openning
I worked (16H50 UTC) BX5AA very strong and clear...
Hope this interest to someone...
ct1fmy@ip.pt
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 13:07:04 -0400
From: "Fred Decker" <fdecker@csi.com>
Subject: Re: [psk31] Re: [PSK31] DX'ing with PSK-31 - A more personal mode
Sorry for making an assumption speaking for myself. I didn't even know
there was a rig that did more than 100 watts. I never even looked at the
1000 because of all the talk about it having features and price out of my
range. :) I guess the "MP" stands for "More Power". hehe
Fred
> Hello everyone. Just so there is no confusion, I run a FT 1000D, that
puts
> out about 225 watts, that is why I can crank it up to 100 watts ...
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 13:17:31 -0400
From: "Fred Decker" <fdecker@csi.com>
Subject: Re: [psk31] Re: [PSK31] DX'ing with PSK-31 - A more personal mode
Sorry for making an assumption speaking for myself. I didn't even know
there was a rig that did more than 100 watts. I never even looked at the
1000D because of all the talk about it having features and price out of my
range. :) They should have put that amp in the "MP" so it could stand for
"more power" hehe I went and looked at the specs and see they do rate
it for at least 200 watts, 50 for AM.
Fred
> Hello everyone. Just so there is no confusion, I run a FT 1000D, that
puts
> out about 225 watts, that is why I can crank it up to 100 watts ...
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 13:29:51 -0400
From: Harvey Fisher <harvee1@optonline.net>
Subject: [psk31] PACTOR INTERFERENCE
SIMPLE SOLUTIONS:
1.WHEN IT COMES ON, QSY...
2.LIVE WITH IT...
IF YOU ALL WAIT FOR THE FCC, ARRL OR IARU TO DO SOMETHING YOU WILL BE TO OLD
TO ENJOY PSK IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM.
73
HARVEY-K2CJP
P.S.
CAPS NOT YELLING; BAD EYES...
IF YOU RESENT CAPS ANYWAY, DON'T READ...
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 16:33:37 +0100
From: "Carlos C Felicio" <ct1fmy@ip.pt>
Subject: [psk31] 5X1P and 5R8GB
Hi list
these 2 stations are near 28.120 now (16H30 UTC)
May be this interest some one...
I am 28.119 +/- (not a really dx... but to work some states... Hi Hi Hi)
Tks for your att
ct1fmy@ip.pt
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 08:14:41 +0000
From: Peter Martinez <Peter.Martinez@btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: [psk31] PSK31 Break-in Operation??
From G3PLX
At 13:30 29/04/2000 -0400, Bob Lewis wrote:
>Peter, are you saying that PSK31 should work with the carrier
>switching off between characters so that you could see text from the
>other station if he tries to break in?
What I am saying is that when you cut carrier (with F5 in my PSK31SBW
program, or with any other PSK31 implementation that claims to be
compatible), you won't generate any garble on the end of the
transmission if the PTT interface is used. Personally, I no longer
send "pse K" on the ends of transmissions within a QSO, since the
squelch tail says it for me (it's not that different from the beep
that the CBers use on the ends of their transmissions on SSB). It
would be possible to work quick-break this way if you get into the
practice of hitting F5 when you stop typing, and it would be possible
to build this into a PSK31 program so that it drops back to receive
after a period of idles, a bit like VOX on SSB. However, I did try
this experimentally in the early days but thought it would be
uncomfortable to use, especially for newcomers.
73
Peter
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 18:29:30 +0000
From: 4x6uo@netvision.net.il
Subject: [psk31] Clock Setting - Digipan.
Hi Everyone , and sorry for the bandwith.
I installed Dgipan on my computer it is a Pentiu III 450mhz, the clock on the
computer is in UTC TIME .
ON WINPSK all is working fine and the time is correct.
ON Digipan THE TIME IS -ONE HOUR (MINUS ONE HOUR) EVEN IF I DID SET THE TIME
ON THE SETTINGS NOTHING IS CHANGING THE TIME ANY IDEA ... TNX Arie 4x6uo.
- --------------------------------------------------------
E-mail: 4x6uo@netvision.net.il
10 - 10 # 45820 VP # 2408
Phone: Res: +972 9 9554205
Mobile:+972 52 571521
Fax :+972 3 5594191
ICQ # : 31010989
Visit my HOME PAGE :http://www.shape.co.il/4x6uo
- -------------------------------------------------------------
"Cigars are like Beautiful Women - You fall in love with
the shape, and then you must work to keep the flame alive!"
- -------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent by Z-MAIL PRO 6.2- from NetManage
- -------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 12:08:13 -0700
From: Bob Williams <n7int@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: [psk31] Digipan and Icom IC-745
Hi,
I'm running an Icom IC-745 attached to a Pentium 133MHz machine; it
works just fine utilizing Logger v7.04. However, when trying to use
Digipan, when I click on TX, sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't.
When it doesn't, it just gives me a 'click' in the computer system's
speakers, and stays in rcv mode.
I am manually switching the rig from rcv to xmt beforehand, and back
again when it actually transmits.
Has anyone else seen (and corrected) this problem? Another friend who
is using the same setup as I do has experienced the same thing. I'd
really like to use digipan, just for the waterfall feature alone.
Thanks in advance.
- --
Bob Williams, Amateur Radio Station N7INT
Cornelius, Oregon (Or-y-gun), Washington County
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 21:07:02 +0100
From: "Robert Wilkinson" <Wilkinson40@tesco.net>
Subject: Re: [psk31] Clock Setting - Digipan.
>Hi Everyone , and sorry for the bandwith.
>I installed Dgipan on my computer it is a Pentiu III 450mhz, the clock on
the
>computer is in UTC TIME .
>ON WINPSK all is working fine and the time is correct.
>ON Digipan THE TIME IS -ONE HOUR (MINUS ONE HOUR) EVEN IF I DID SET THE
TIME
>ON THE SETTINGS NOTHING IS CHANGING THE TIME ANY IDEA ... TNX Arie 4x6uo.
I've just checked my version of Digipan, my time is also 1 hour slow.
Bob Wilkinson.
Wilkinson40@tesco.net
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 16:16:05 -0400
From: "Richard B Drake" <rbdrake@erols.com>
Subject: RE: [psk31] Clock Setting - Digipan.
Go to your windows control panel, select "Date/Time" and make sure
your time zone is set to GMT. I keep my computer set to local time
and set the time zone to EST with a correction for daylight
savings time. FYI: EST is GMT -5. DigiPan displays and records the
time correctly in UTC.
Bye the way, computers are notoriously bad time keepers and I
highly recommend a shareware program named SocketWatch available
at http://www.locutuscodeware.com/ (I have no affiliation with
them). This little gem runs silently in the background and keeps
your computer clock synchronized with atomic standards whenever
you are logged on to your service provider. Perhaps if more people
use that they will send the correct time when they attach it to
their PSK signoff instead of something that is several minutes off
:-)
- ----
73, Rich - W3ZJ
>
> Hi Everyone , and sorry for the bandwith.
> I installed Dgipan on my computer it is a Pentiu III
> 450mhz, the clock on the
> computer is in UTC TIME .
> ON WINPSK all is working fine and the time is correct.
> ON Digipan THE TIME IS -ONE HOUR (MINUS ONE HOUR) EVEN
> IF I DID SET THE TIME
> ON THE SETTINGS NOTHING IS CHANGING THE TIME ANY IDEA
> ... TNX Arie 4x6uo.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 15:25:27 -0500
From: fkamp <fkamp@home.com>
Subject: Re: [psk31] Digipan and Icom IC-745
I have noticed the same basic problem when running Digipan.
I use a 686 233mmx clone with Soundblaster live. I also use
com2 as PTT control for the transceiver. The transceiver is
a Pegasus on com1. Mouse in on a ps2 port.
Sometimes when I hit transmit it stays in receive, so I hit
it again until it goes into transmit. Doesn't happen all
the time, but it only happens when running Digipan.
Frank Kamp
K5DKZ
Bob Williams wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm running an Icom IC-745 attached to a Pentium 133MHz machine; it
> works just fine utilizing Logger v7.04. However, when trying to use
> Digipan, when I click on TX, sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't.
> When it doesn't, it just gives me a 'click' in the computer system's
> speakers, and stays in rcv mode.
> I am manually switching the rig from rcv to xmt beforehand, and back
> again when it actually transmits.
> Has anyone else seen (and corrected) this problem? Another friend who
> is using the same setup as I do has experienced the same thing. I'd
> really like to use digipan, just for the waterfall feature alone.
> Thanks in advance.
> --
> Bob Williams, Amateur Radio Station N7INT
> Cornelius, Oregon (Or-y-gun), Washington County
>
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 17:01:44 -0400
From: "Fred Decker" <fdecker@csi.com>
Subject: Re: [psk31] Clock Setting - Digipan.
>
> Go to your windows control panel, select "Date/Time" and make sure
> your time zone is set to GMT. I keep my computer set to local time
> and set the time zone to EST with a correction for daylight
> savings time. FYI: EST is GMT -5. DigiPan displays and records the
> time correctly in UTC.
You lost me here, can you explain? This seems like a contradiction, you
are either set for GMT or your are set for EST. If you live on the
Eastern Seaboard, is there a reason why you wouldn't want to have it set
to EST? Most programs that I want, have a choice to either use the system
clock or let you put in an offset, like -5 for GMT.
Fred
N4IXL
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 17:35:54 -0400
From: "Richard B Drake" <rbdrake@erols.com>
Subject: RE: [psk31] Clock Setting - Digipan.
I must have said something confusing because I'm doing exactly
what you said. Set the clock to local time, set the time zone in
the control panel to EST (GMT -5). Now the computer displays local
time on the task bar and DigiPan displays UTC because it can find
the correct offset. It occurred to me after I saw a second post
that was off by one hour that the problem may have to do with
daylight savings time. If you have DST on your local area, make
sure that the checkbox in the control panel display to
"Automatically adjust for daylight savings time is checked",
othrwise you will be off by one hour.
- ---
73, Rich - W3ZJ
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-psk31@aintel.bi.ehu.es
> [mailto:owner-psk31@aintel.bi.ehu.es]On Behalf Of Fred Decker
> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 5:02 PM
> To: Richard B Drake; psk31@bipt106.bi.ehu.es
> Subject: Re: [psk31] Clock Setting - Digipan.
>
>
>
> >
> > Go to your windows control panel, select "Date/Time"
> and make sure
> > your time zone is set to GMT. I keep my computer set
> to local time
> > and set the time zone to EST with a correction for daylight
> > savings time. FYI: EST is GMT -5. DigiPan displays
> and records the
> > time correctly in UTC.
>
> You lost me here, can you explain? This seems like a
> contradiction, you
> are either set for GMT or your are set for EST. If you
> live on the
> Eastern Seaboard, is there a reason why you wouldn't
> want to have it set
> to EST? Most programs that I want, have a choice to
> either use the system
> clock or let you put in an offset, like -5 for GMT.
>
> Fred
> N4IXL
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 23:18:12 +0100
From: "Robert Wilkinson" <Wilkinson40@tesco.net>
Subject: [psk31] Re- Clock setting Digipan
I've just unchecked the UTC box in Digipan
and now the display is the same as the PC clock.
Bob Wilkinson
Wilkinson40@tesco.net
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 18:27:48 +0000
From: Peter Martinez <Peter.Martinez@btinternet.com>
Subject: [psk31] Automatic stations
From G3PLX.
The comments I made recently were intended to raise this subject
again, to co-incide with the publication of a letter by me to the
editor of QST on the same subject. Although I was told it would be
printed in the May issue, it did not.
I raised in that letter the suggestion that we could solve the
current interference problem by dividing the RTTY sub-bands into two
parts, one for live QSOs and one for machine QSOs. To be precise, in
the "live" band the existing rules about preventing interference to
other band users would apply (and therefore a live operator must be
present to listen to the receiver and control the transmitter), and
in the "auto" band these rules would be waived so that stations could
use machine techniques without being restricted by the need to check
the frequency for ANY other activity or solve the tricky "hidden
transmitter" interference problem. Live operators would be permitted
in the auto band (for example to access a mailbox), but they would
have to accept that the automatic stations may cause interference.
This proposal gives both automatic stations and live stations
something to gain, and could well be something that both sides of the
present conflict could "buy into". I would suggest live operations
from 14070 upwards and automatic stations (and I am talking about
automatic Pactor, AMTOR, and packet) from 14112 downwards, with the
boundary-line to be decided. If, for example, we thought that the
band could be divided equally between live and auto, then the
dividing line would be at 14090.
The automatic operators would gain in that they would cease to get
complaints from live operators and would be able to link with each
other more easily without the need to check the channel. Both sides
would, of course, benefit from less interference.. I had originally
thought that this might be done by a change to the existing FCC
rules, but it could equally work purely as a voluntary agreement if
the solution can be formulated so that both sides win. We can never
achieve a voluntary agreement by just shouting "Ban mailboxes".
73
Peter
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:59:48 -0700
From: "Jerry & Celesta" <kk6pa@ridgenet.net>
Subject: Re: [psk31] Digipan and Icom IC-745
Hi Bob. That problem sounds like it is either a computer problem or
software problem. There is
a slight possibility there is a glitch with your software. Maybe try
re-downloading the software
again and see if the helps.
I have a Kenwood TS-450. Was in a QSO yesterday when the Digipan software
started to cut back
to receive even though I was xmtg. For several tries it would start to xmt
and then go to rcv. ????
Maybe the authors of the program have some suggestions...
Jerry Brooks, KK6PA
Ridgecrest, CA
> Hi,
> I'm running an Icom IC-745 attached to a Pentium 133MHz machine; it
> works just fine utilizing Logger v7.04. However, when trying to use
> Digipan, when I click on TX, sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't.
> When it doesn't, it just gives me a 'click' in the computer system's
> speakers, and stays in rcv mode.
> I am manually switching the rig from rcv to xmt beforehand, and back
> again when it actually transmits.
> Has anyone else seen (and corrected) this problem? Another friend who
> is using the same setup as I do has experienced the same thing. I'd
> really like to use digipan, just for the waterfall feature alone.
> Thanks in advance.
> --
> Bob Williams, Amateur Radio Station N7INT
> Cornelius, Oregon (Or-y-gun), Washington County
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 22:20:34 -0400
From: "Theodore D. Mills" <n3kwq@martnet.com>
Subject: RE: [psk31] TS-520SE
This is auto keying using the com port.
I have used the QST setup with both PSK31SBW and Digipan.
You'll need a 16 bit soundcard though.....
That's requirement #1
That and a 486/33 or better PC.
I have run PSK31SBW on a 486/33 Win 3.11 and 8MB of RAM.
I understand that Digipan needs 486/66 or better....
I'm using a PII 400 MMX w/ 64MB RAM and 100Mhz frontside bus.
Nice & quick!
73 de Ted N32KWQ/AE
At 13:09 5/1/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Sounds like the route to take.
>Is this auto keying or manual keying? Someone on QRP-L said they use it but
>it is all manual keying for Xmit. I don't care as long as it works but I
>want to know what results I am looking for. I went Saturday and purchased
>the parts specified from Rat Shak, so I am ready to start construction. I
>have one hold up though, I think my sound card is 8 bit and that seems to
>be a problem. No one has mentioned an 8 bit card.
>
>
"This message brought to you with 100% recycled electrons"
"Just the latest in environmentally friendly technology!"
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 22:53:43 -0400
From: "Richard B Drake" <rbdrake@erols.com>
Subject: RE: [psk31] Automatic stations
Peter,
The ARRL can not make rules, they can only act as a lobbyist
(voice) between individuals or groups of individuals and the FCC,
for rules changes they believe to be in the best interest of
Amateur radio. Their requests are sometimes left in limbo for
years, sometimes implemented and sometimes denied. However, they
can request voluntary compliance with a band plan and usually the
majority of operators will buy into that because it really is in
our own best interest. I applaud your suggestion, and have no idea
why QST didn't publish it in the May issue. Perhaps it was just an
editorial problem or perhaps they are weighing the consequences
very carefully before going public. What can we do as a group to
help? Who did you correspond with at ARRL? Perhaps 1000 letters
from avid PSKers would help get it off dead center.
- ---
73, Rich - W3ZJ
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 23:53:11 EDT
From: Ke4yyddave@aol.com
Subject: Re: [psk31] 6 meter psk31
SIX METERS OPEN TONIGHT. MADE SEVERAL CONTACTS ON 50.300
DAVID KE4YYD
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 09:52:02 +0200
From: Eduardo Jacob <jtpjatae@bi.ehu.es>
Subject: [psk31] Laptops and PSK31
As the question on laptops and PSK31 is somewhat recurrent and needed, I
suggest to everybody in the list that is using a Laptop succesfully with
PSK31 to send a message to me: jtpjatae@bi.ehu.es with a subject of PSK31
and laptop and in the body of the message the first line saying:
Brand, Model, Operating System, (Optional) email address
and after that
(Optional) Notes about the setup
Example
>>>
To: Eduardo Jacob <xxx@xxx>
Subject: PSK31 and laptop
- ---
Toshiba, 2140CDS, Windows 98, jtpjatae@bi.ehu.es
This note is not useful in this case as it works flawlessly. There is
nothing to tweak.
>>>>
I'll gather the message during a week or two and prepare a new page, with
the results.
If somebody is using other "selectively friendly" operating systems as
Linux, in the notes it should be interesting to note the kernel and the
sound drivers used. It would be interesting also to put pointers to related
driver pages.
If somebody has not been able to put a laptop to work, please send also a
message with a Subject line of: NOT PSK31 and laptop
Regards
Eduardo/EA2BAJ
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
to unsuscribe from the list send to majordomo@aintel.bi.ehu.es a message
with a text line as follow: unsubscribe psk31 or unsubscribe psk31-digest
More instructions on PSK31 Webpage: http://aintel.bi.ehu.es/psk31.html
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
------------------------------
End of Psk31 Digest V1 #381
***************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
