| |
SQ6BOT > PSBBS 01.07.96 17:57l 41 Lines 1640 Bytes #-10327 (0) @ WW
BID : 176SR6BOX003
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Some ideas
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<DB0WGS<OE3XSR<OK0PBX<SP6KBL<SR6BOX
Sent: 960701/1329z @:SR6BOX.#WRO.POL.EU [BayCom-Mailbox [Wroclaw]] BCM1.37b
From: SQ6BOT @ SR6BOX.#WRO.POL.EU (Zipu)
To : PSBBS @ WW
SM7UGE wrote:
> Abt. Protocols. Could someone pleeeezzzz make a protocol,
> that can have larger paclen in each packet, like 512 or 1024 bytes,
> or even more. And also no limit for number of packets outstanding.
> Yes, I KNOW there is something called TCP/IP..... ;-) But I don't
> like the look of f.x JNOS and how it is used - there is several
> hundreds of commands and parameters to keep track of to get it
> functioning as you want.... okey, not several hundred... perhaps 90 ;-)
So TCP/IP with most parameters set as default (have you ever setting up
AX.25 T1, T2, T3, T4 timers and many other things while using TNC or
TFPCX? So the same could be done here)
> Tripple-checking of CRC on forward... hi. All these lost and broken
> 7plus-files are really a sign of a bad network...... WHAT is really
> going wrong ?!
S51RM wrote some time ago about errors on packet net. The conclusion was
that it's almost impossible for error to appear on the protocol level.
So what causes hundreds of .ERR files? BBS software, not handshaked
connections between TNC and PC, etc.
> If there is a window to monitor the traffic - PLEASE don't make it
> like NOS-programs; make it like WA8DED HOST-mode! There I think
> it is stated very clearly what is happening! In NOS you have to do
> MUCH READING to quickly understand what you see!
I (or maybe somebody else) will do scrolling of trace and connect sessions.
> I have run out of ideas for the moment... Please put me up on the list
> as first beta-tester, HI!
You'll have a lot to do ;-)
> 73 de Fredrik SM7UGE
73 de Peter
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
