| |
G0FTD > PLT 24.02.04 04:11l 17 Lines 507 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 7A0336G0FTD
Read: GUEST OE3FAS OE3LI
Subj: PLT/BPL = wireless lan ?
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0AR<VK3TE<GB7MAX<GB7COV<GB7YFS<GB7CIP<
GB7SXE
Sent: 040224/0001Z @:GB7SXE.#38.GBR.EU #:38550 [Hastings] FBB7.00i $:7A0336G0FT
From: G0FTD@GB7SXE.#38.GBR.EU
To : PLT@WW
I'm just wondering *if* BPL/PLT ever does take of (which I suspect
the overiding economic and political decision will eventually make
possible) be used in reverse ?
For example, all the millions of miles of cable work will act as a
receiving antenna for computer users to wirelessly connect without
a physical connection.
Whilst I sincerely hope that our bands are not ruined by BPL/PLT,
I can to some degree understand the factors in it's favour.
- Andy -
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
