| |
KG6BAJ > NWSGRP 14.08.09 03:12l 36 Lines 1282 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 9876_N1OES
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Circular versus linear polarization
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<HB9EAS<DB0LHR<DB0KTL<DB0ZDF<DB0LJ<DB0RES<WA7V<
KG6BAJ<KG6BAJ
Sent: 090812/2000Z @:KG6BAJ.#NCA.CA.USA.NOAM #:9876 [Grass Valley] InterGate $:
** NEWSGROUP: rec.radio.amateur.antenna
** FROM : tom <news4792@taring.org>
Art Unwin wrote:
>
> Use your own thread to ask for assistance on your question.
> Be prepared to answer why you are requesting this personal service .
> I asked a question on this thread with respect to the main advantage
> for hams that linear
> polarization has over CP. I have no resistance to change if it can be
> justified. I see
> that it can pick up signals that linear antennas cannot hear because
> of a 30 db attenuation
> where as CP has only a 3 db attenuation!
> So what is it on the other side of the coin is what this thread is
> posing to those who are familiar with respect to radiators.
You stated that MOST commercial antennas are CP. Having been in that
business to some extent, I know that statement to be false. I'm simple
asking you to prove it.
Also where is this information that shows linear antennas have 30dB of
attenuation? When? How? What conditions?
And when do the CP antennas have 3dB by comparison? Give references.
I know you can't since all these things are figments of your addled brain.
tom
K0TAR
GVBBS:KG6BAJ-1 Internet Newsgroup <-> Packet Radio Gateway Server
** InterPacketGATE V1.6 Beta INTERNET <-> PACKET Radio Gateway by NL1RSD **
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
