OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
PE1BIV > JNOS     05.10.13 15:23l 55 Lines 1682 Bytes #-4556 (0) @ WW
BID : 30809_#SIN
Read: DK3UZ GUEST
Subj: Giving JNOS a bad name.....
Path: DB0FHN<DB0PM<OE5XBL<F1OYP<IZ3LSV<I0OJJ<GB7CIP<AA6HF<KD6OAT<VE7ASS<
      VE1FYI<N1URO<WA7V<DB0RES<PI8CDR<PE1BIV
Sent: 131005/0847z @:PE1BIV.#YMD.NLD.EURO JNOS #:18385 $:18387_PE1BIV

>From pe1biv%pe1biv.#ymd.nld.euro@ve1fyi.ampr.org Sat Oct  5 08:23:52 2013
Received: from ve1fyi.ampr.org by ve1fyi.ampr.org (jnos 2.0f vhf/hf/aprs/ampernet) with SMTP
	id AA404140 ; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 08:23:52 ADT
Message-Id: <30809_#sin@ve1jot.bbs>
>From: pe1biv@pe1biv.#ymd.nld.euro
X-JNOS-User-Port: Uplink   (VE1JOT on port jot)  ->   Sending message

Hi all,

It seems there are a few people using JNOS who are busy giving JNOS 
a bad name because it seems they have no clue in what they are doing....

So, please make sure that you do not forward bulletins out with a new 
BID given by your BBS, but make sure the original BID stays in tact...

And please, leave the JNOS SMTP headers out of the BBS/FBB forward.


Rgs, 73, Angela












--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PE1BIV *** [44.137.77.49] *** IJMUIDEN - NL *** JO22hl *** CM44h *** M1SCH
AX25: pe1biv@pe1biv.#ymd.nld.euro  ******  smtp: pe1biv_at_pe1biv.ampr.org
E-mail: pe1biv_at_gmail.com ************** Member from: IEEE, NADARS, PWGN
Packet Radio Homepage: http://http.pe1biv.ampr.org (Packet Radio) 
                     : http://www.pe1biv.net (Internet) 

I am opposed to my bulletins being placed on systems where these bulletins 
can be publicly accessed by anyone, including search engines and spambots, 
from the Internet, without that the user first has to logon to have access 
to the system!
Having Packet bulletins on display on so many systems, where the sysops 
think these bulletins are so important for the people outside of Amateur 
Radio that they need to have access to them, quite often indefinitely, is 
just ridiculous Internet polution!










Read previous mail | Read next mail


 29.03.2026 17:38:24lGo back Go up