OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
VE2HAR > MT63     18.03.05 16:38l 122 Lines 3258 Bytes #-6999 (0) @ WW
BID : 46778SENTTO
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: [MT63] Digest Number 865
Path: DB0FHN<DB0THA<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0IUZ<DB0GOS<ON0AR<ON0AR<VA2HAR<VE2HAR
Sent: 050318/1417z @:VE2HAR.#MTL.QC.CAN.NOAM Laval #:43661 $:46778sentto

> 
> Hello John,
> 
> >> With respect to the mode, well I am not convinced that MT63 works
> better than MFSK under really poor conditions, although the baud rate
> is higher. <<
> 
> Forgive me for sticking my aging brain in here, but I couldn't resist.
> In regard to emergency data communications, when all is said and done,
> when conditions are truly abysmal, there just ain't no substitute for
> the old-fasioned AMTOR ARQ mode.
> 

Norm,

At a 0 dB SNR on a poor CCIR channel, AMTOR ARQ has ZERO throughput but MFSK16
will have full throughput.

While I don't know how MFSK16 works with WMix or other Windows MFSK16
applications, gMFSK seems to allow you to send a file when MFSK16 is selected. 
Someone may want to confirm this.

But the fact is that MFSK12 will copy down at -10 dB SNR as well as it does at a
+10 dB SNR.

> When done correctly by someone who knows how to use that mode, IMHO
> it can't be beaten for accurate, error-free communications. When you
> realize that the SITOR specs (CCIR Recommendation 476 et al) that
> really govern AMTOR call for NOT MORE THAH THREE CHARACTER ERRORS IN
> ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND CHARACTERS, it is hard to find another SCD mode
> that can do as well under abominable HF conditions.

MT63 is 99% error free down at a -10 dB SNR on a poor CCIR channel.  Typing/
trasncription errors in emergency communications are 2-4%.  

As G4HPE has shown, at a -10 dB SNR, MT63 will have about a 1% error rate.

My choice would be MT63 or if more robustness is needed, then MFSK16.

> 
> After all, what difference does the baud rate make when the link is
> repeatedly lost?

This is true...however, remember that the more robust the mode, the better then
chance of getting you data through "when conditions are truly abysmal".

> 
> Just my not-so-humble opinion based on a few long decades of working
> with this stuff.

Yea, I know...I"ve been doing EComms since the Hurricane season of 1961 and with
the Air Force starting in 1967.

Of course Texas doesn't have as many hurricanes as Flordia.  

I was involved with Hurricane Andrew while with the Air Force.  I was supporting
the NDMS Aux DOC in Oklahoma City during Andrew.

Best Regards,

Walt/K5YFW

> 
> 73,
> 
> Norm Sternberg W2JUP - NNN0TOA
> Plantation, FL
> 
> (TS-2000/PK-232/DSP-2232/ATU-1000/GAP Titan-DX)
> 
> 
> 
> <<  Try MT63 on 80m - great fun!>>
> 
> - The MT63 Reflector -
>    MT63@egroups.com
> 
> (To unsubscribe. send email to
> MT63-unsubscribe@onelist.com)
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Listen to Internet Radio! Access to your favorite Artists!
Click to listen to LAUNCHcast now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_mKGzA/GARHAA/kkyPAA/CPMolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

<<  Try MT63 on 80m - great fun!>>

- The MT63 Reflector -
   MT63@egroups.com

(To unsubscribe. send email to
MT63-unsubscribe@onelist.com)
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MT63/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    MT63-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Read previous mail | Read next mail


 18.05.2024 19:54:36lGo back Go up