OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
VK6BE  > CARS     22.06.08 02:18l 26 Lines 1111 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 202312VK6BE
Read: GUEST
Subj: RE: BOB's Dad's Model T
Path: DB0FHN<DB0MRW<OK0PKL<OK0PCC<OM0PBC<OK0PPL<DB0RES<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<F6CDD<
      F6BVP<VK2TV
Sent: 080622/0008Z @:VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC #:39868 [Kempsey, QF68JX] $:202312VK
From: VK6BE@VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC
To  : CARS@WW


I can't remember where the fuel tank was on the Model T. It could have
been where you say. The reason for reversing up a steep hill that I
remember was (1) to let the  big end bearings remain in the sump oil and
stop them knocking and (2) to use reverse gear which was a lower ratio
than first. There were only two forward gears.

I had an A model Ford which had the fuel tank where you stated but I never
knew it to starve for fuel on any sort of hill. There could have been a
problem when the tank was almost empty but it is so long ago I can't
remember.
Cheers,
Bob VK6BE.

> 
> YOU WERE COMMENTING ON  THE MODEL T AND THAT SOMETIMES WHILE GOING UP HILLS
> THEY WOULD HAVE TO GO UP BACKWARDS.   THE REASON FOR THAT WAS THAT THE GAS
> TANK WAS LOCATED JUST BELOW THE WINDSHIELD AND  IT WAS GRAVITY FLOW SYSTEM.
> WHEN GOING UP A STEEP HILL THE ANGLE WAS SUCH THAT THE GASOLINE  DID NOT
> FLOW TO THE ENGINE, BUT IF THEY WENT UP BACKWARDS THE TANK WOULD BE AT 
> A DIFFERENT ANGLE AND THE FLOW WOULD BE OK.  I REMEMBER MY GRANDFATHER
> TELLING ME ABOUT THAT.


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 05.07.2026 03:39:23lGo back Go up