| |
RN1M > LINUX 10.03.24 18:04l 56 Lines 1891 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 2118_RN1M
Read: DK5SG DJ6UX GUEST
Subj: Trouble: DietPi Nano Pi Neo+Direwolf
Path: DB0FHN<DB0PM<OE5XBL<OE2XZR<OE6XPE<DB0ERF<DK0WUE<GB7CIP<N2NOV<K5DAT<
PA8F<PI8LAP<RN1M
Sent: 240310/1102Z 2118@RN1M.SPB.RUS.EU LinBPQ6.0.24
Hello OMs!
Now Iâ€Öm trying to launch a couple of audio modems on the basis of a Nanopi single-board computer (I started with direwolf, bu
t still in terms of ardop), so that I can connect to them via Wi-Fi from android applications via TCP\IP and work in FX.25 and
Winlink.
The Nano Pi has a built-in audio card with pins to which I planned to attach an interface and a radio.
https://wiki.friendlyelec.com/wiki/index.php/NanoPi_NEO
While I canâ€Öt start the sound, using the direwolf as an example, I do the following and get an error:
root@DietPi:~# arecord -l
**** List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices ****
card 0: Codec [H3 Audio Codec], device 0: CDC PCM Codec-0 [CDC PCM Codec-0]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
root@DietPi:~# cat /proc/asound/cards
0 [Codec ]: H3_Audio_Codec - H3 Audio Codec
H3 Audio Codec
root@DietPi:~# nano /root/direwolf.conf
ADEVICE plughw:0,0
CHANNEL 0
MODEM 1200
root@DietPi:~# direwolf
Dire Wolf DEVELOPMENT version 1.8 A (Mar 9 2024)
Includes optional support for: cm108-ptt dns-sd
Dire Wolf requires only privileges available to ordinary users.
Running this as root is an unnecessary security risk.
…
Audio device for both receive and transmit: plughw:0,0 (channel 0)
Channel 0: 1200 baud, AFSK 1200 & 2200 Hz, A+, 44100 sample rate / 3, DTMF decoder enabled.
…
Ready to accept AGW client application 0 on port 8000 ...
Ready to accept KISS TCP client application 0 on port 8001 ...
DNS-SD: Avahi: Failed to create Avahi client: Daemon not running
Audio input device 0 error code -5: Input/output error
…
Audio input device 0 error code -5: Input/output error
Terminating after audio input failure.
root@DietPi:~#
Any ideas? Maybe some package is missing?
I would appreciate any help with this project.
73!
--
1200 baud it's greater, than zero bits per second :)
Best regards, Sergey Ievkov <RN1M@RN1M.SPB.RUS.EU>
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
