OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
GM4CAQ > HF       12.09.03 09:28l 43 Lines 1068 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 3553_GM4CAQ
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: Re: why no qtlloc on hf
Path: DB0FHN<DB0THA<DB0ERF<DB0HOT<OK0PBX<OK0PHL<OK0POV<OK0POW<OK0NAG<OK0PPL<
      DB0RES<ON0AR<IK1ZNW<GB7CRV<GB7FUR<GB7IOM<GB7SAN<GB7EDN<GB7EDN
Sent: 030912/0709z @:GB7EDN.#77.GBR.EU $:3553_GM4CAQ Sally 3.2.128
From: GM4CAQ@GB7EDN.#77.GBR.EU


Quoting from a previous message...

} 
} From: PE1RBG@PI8WFL.#NH1.NLD.EU
} To  : HF@WW
} 
} Hello all 
} 
} can someone  tell me why it is not normal to use
} the gridsquare information on hf ? 
} 
} 73 pe1rbg Roel            JO22RM ;)

Roel

I think the answer is that it isn't 'needed' to make a contact or gain awards.

On VHF, precise antenna direction is more important and available countries are 
few and difficult to get so people have used locator squares for awards and 
calculated precise headings and distances from the grid squares for a long 
time.

On HF however.. Countries are easy.. aerials generally wide angle/non 
steerable.. 
Also its much more enjoyable trying to spell Gelsenkircken on cw and find it on 
the map..or tell the Yanks we are in Linlithgow which is in Scotland not near 
London.. England.. a locator would simply take all the fun out of the contact 
;)

Tot Ziens

Located in IO85 something or other

73 Bob gm4caq. 

Timed Friday 12 September 2003  06:55 gmt
BBS       GM4CAQ@GB7EDN.#77.GBR.EU



Read previous mail | Read next mail


 27.07.2026 00:08:31lGo back Go up