| |
VK6BE > 40MTR 16.07.03 04:45l 34 Lines 1443 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 522066VK6BE
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: Re: WARC AU 40M etc
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<RZ6HXA<HA3PG<IK1ZNW<7M3TJZ<E21CJN<VK3TE<ZL2BAU<
VK6HGR<VK6BBR<VK6RAW<VK6PBV<VK6JY
Sent: 030716/0134Z @:VK6JY.#ALY.#WA.AUS.OC #:14519 [Albany] FBB7 $:522066VK6BE
From: VK6BE@VK6JY.#ALY.#WA.AUS.OC
To : 40MTR@WW
Well then, Andy, what was the point in bringing the matter up on packet at
all? It had nothing to do with us and we don't accept any blame!! Ease up
you fellers over there. You are becoming very heavy!! We are fellow
amateurs with much the same interests as you and most of us (60%) came
from British background with a miniscule number having convict
background!! Your continuous sniping could make us wish we had other
antecedents!
Cheers, fellers, cheers! Lighten up!
Bob VK6BE
>
>> That's real news to me.
>> When we in Australia got the extra space on 40 metres about 35 years ago I
>> was President of the WIA in this state. I cannot remember any opposition
>> to any other part of the world receiving the extra allocation. If there
>> had been it would have been discussed in our Council. Why should Australia
>> oppose it? The Yanks already had it so why not the rest? Australia
>> certainly did not have the allocation 50 years ago as you seem to imply.
>> We didn't even have 21 megs 50 years ago. No shame to Australia! It might
>> have been opposed by the local authority but that is not opposition from
>> the amateur service.
>> Bob VK6BE
>
> I did'nt say the position to oppose any change came from amateur service.
>
> I am referring to this years conference delegates who originally wanted to
> see no change in the status of the Region 1 40m allocation.
>
> - Andy -
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
