OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
G0FTD  > AM       26.05.03 19:42l 29 Lines 956 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : BE1776G0FTD
Read: GUEST DB0FHN
Subj: Anyone still use AM ?
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0AR<VE3FJB<IK6PYS<IS0HHA<IK1ZNW<GB7CRV<
      GB7CIP<GB7SXE
Sent: 030526/1405Z @:GB7SXE.#38.GBR.EU #:3104 [Hastings] FBB7.00i $:BE1776G0FTD
From: G0FTD@GB7SXE.#38.GBR.EU
To  : AM@WW


Well does anyone still use AM on any frequency ?

I am curious to know especially if:

1) You use it for local working perhaps with a homebrew QRP rig
2) You have regular usage using a commercial rig.

I was thinking about AM again with reference to another small HF tx
I was designing to be a companion with my Sony SW100 receiver.

Locally there has always been AM nets nearly every day on 160m since
Marconi was a lad.

I have used it on 160m, plus once on 80m to the [I think it was] 
Imperial War Museam, the operator giving a demo of old WW2 equipment,
plus quite a few QSO's to South America and North America on 29Mhz
when conditions allow. I have also once used it on 6m plus I've used it
recently on 2m to good effect.

I know AM is hardly a dx mode, but it can still be useful, especially
for local working and QRP transmitters since it gives cheap voice
operation when working the locals.

- Andy -


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 01.08.2026 12:08:07lGo back Go up