| |
VK2AAB > HF 11.05.03 15:44l 26 Lines 813 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 44812_VK2AAB
Read: DB0FHN GUEST
Subj: Re: New BBS
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<DB0FSG<DB0PV<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0GOS<ON0AR<ON0AR<
VK6HGR<VK5UJ<VK5BRC<VK5ATB<VK2AAB
Sent: 030511/1253Z @:VK2AAB.SYD.NSW.AUS.OC #:44812 [SYDNEY] FBB7 $:44812_VK2AAB
From: VK2AAB@VK2AAB.SYD.NSW.AUS.OC
To : HF@WW
Hello All,
Actually if you think about it the following decision by the RA is
reasonable. If a British citizen is going to cause a radio transmission in a
foreign country, then it is reasonable to expect a legitimate callsign to be
used.
If the callsign is that of the voice or keyboard output then that is as it
should be. Whats the alternative, use someone elses callsign ?
73 Barry VK2AAB
>Wrong! Wrong! Wrong!
>
>The RA are *NOW* claiming that using the internet to access the packet
>network in the UK and with the message 1st being transmitted by radio in
>VK-land for example requires you comply with BR68 and the WT Act even
>though the 1st use of RF occurs outside the UK. Madness but they make the
>rules!
>
>73 de Andy GM7HUD
>ÿ
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
