OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
VK3JCW > KENWOO   28.04.03 01:34l 26 Lines 1169 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : DC0008VK3JCW
Read: DK1MBY GUEST VE7HFY
Subj: S9 = 40dB ???????????
Path: DB0ZKA<DB0KFB<DB0GAP<DB0BOX<DB0MRW<OK0PKL<OK0PPL<RZ6HXA<SP7MGD<VK7AX<
      VK3AC<VK3AYM<VK3DSE
Sent: 030427/0008Z @:VK3DSE.#MEL.VIC.AUS.OC #:47902 [Narre Warren] FBB7.00g25
From: VK3JCW@VK3DSE.#MEL.VIC.AUS.OC
To  : KENWOO@WW


Thanks for reading this message.  Maybe you can help me out with my
dilemma.

Recently, I sat down to adjust the S-Meter on my old Kenwood TS-520S
transceiver, as per the Service Manual.   The manual stated that the
S-Meter reading should be adjusted to read S9 for a 40dB signal received
at the antenna at 14.175Mhz.  Before I commencing the adjustment, I
decided to compare signal strength readings of the TS-520S to a new
Kenwood TS-50 transceiver.  At 14.175Mhz, both radios read the same static
level of S3.  Both radios indicated the same S-Meter reading of 20dB of a
QSO I was listening to on 20 meters.   So what's the problem you ask?

Well, If I am to adjust the S-Meter on the TS-520S as per the manual a S9
reading would indicate a 40dB signal.   For the same siganl on my TS-50
radio, the signal would read 40dB.   I always thought that regardless of
the type or make of an S-Meter, they should read the same for any given
signal.   Is there an error in the Service Manual?   Should I adjust the
S-Meter as detailed in the manual?   I would greatly appreciate your
thoughts on this one.  

73s de Col


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 29.09.2024 01:42:33lGo back Go up