| |
I0OJJ > JNOS2 27.11.19 19:02l 35 Lines 1073 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : RBTI0OJJ_006
Read: DF7EAV GUEST DJ6UX
Subj: Re: N1URO Unhold Script updated
Path: DB0FHN<OE2XZR<OE5XBR<OE1XAB<HG8LXL<XE1FH<CX2SA<N9PMO<VE3UIL<I0OJJ<
I0OJJ
Sent: 191127/1658z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] obcm1.08-3-g9b42
>From i0ojj%i0ojj.ita.eu@i0ojj.ampr.org Wed Nov 27 17:58:51 2019
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0m-uro) with SMTP
id AA38357 ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 17:58:51 +0100
Message-Id: <RBTI0OJJ_006@i0ojj.bbs>
>From: i0ojj@i0ojj.ita.eu
X-JNOS-User-Port: Telnet (i0ojj @ 44.134.32.240) -> Sending message
From: I0OJJ @ I0OJJ.ITA.EU (Gustavo)
To: JNOS2 @ WW
X-Info: Sent with login password
X-Info: Received by SMTP-gateway
> Date: 27 Nov 19 13:00:00 GMT
> From: n1uro@n1uro.#cct.ct.usa.noam
> To: jnos2@ww
> Subject: Unhold Script updated
> Due to the recent flood of dupe mail sent by N2NOV I've updated my unhold
> script accordingly. It seems JNOS did flag these mails with an Age tag as
> seen below so I upgraded the unhold script so that if it senses such mail
> in JNOS it will email the sysop with the area(s) old/dupe mail is being held
Good!
I found *only* the following line:
27.11.19 05:15:30l VE4KLM>JNOS2 @WW~VE4KLM $21135_ve4klm->95390_AA6HF
so I removed the BID block to AA6HF BID ...
--
73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj/ir0aab/ir0eq
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
