| |
G0FTD > IRLP 16.04.05 22:24l 50 Lines 1334 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : B30413G0FTD
Read: GUEST DK5RAS DF1ND DH6MBT
Subj: Re: New IRLP node on Canary Island
Path: DB0FHN<DB0THA<DB0ERF<DB0HGW<ON0DXC<ON0RET<DB0RES<ON0AR<GB7CIP<GB7SXE
Sent: 050416/1154Z @:GB7SXE.#38.GBR.EU #:27835 [Hastings] FBB7.00i $:B30413G0FT
From: G0FTD@GB7SXE.#38.GBR.EU
To : IRLP@WW
I previously sent:
> EA8EE wrote:-
>> The number is 8628
>> Welcome any call
>>
>>
>>
>> ÞßÛÜÝÜ 73's de:
>
> No mention of any frequency.
>
> Shall I assume that EA8EE is a fake radio ham
which appears to have caused at least one packeteer to question my own
question which was "What frequency is it on" ?
To assume we all know is daft.
What if I was a holiday maker in the Canary Islands in the next week and
I wanted to use it ?
I'd need to know the frequency wouldn't I.
What if I was an HF'er on 29Mhz FM - which EA8EE also used his IRLP
node on in the past and wanted to use it via sporadic E (which is now
the start of the season).
Erm...I'd need to know the *frequency* wouldn't I !
I was then told "well look up EA8EE on the internet".
No why the heck should I - he's just told the world in a packet message
his node is active, so why can't he tell us what the frequency is by
packet too ?
Is it a secret ?
Y'know I have a great deal of difficulty beleiving that anything is
actually *radio* if it doesn't a frequency to operate on.
Or are there any tranceivers on the market that don't need frequencies
any more ? (clever blokes those Japanese) ;-)
- Andy (sent by packet RADIO but sorry I can't divulge what freq I used)-
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
