OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
KB2VXA > INFO     01.06.04 14:21l 34 Lines 1270 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 24094_WT3V
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: VK6BE > junk stopper
Path: DB0FHN<DB0FOR<DB0SIF<HB9EAS<HB9AK<K1UOL<K1UOL<WB2QJA<KC2COJ<WT3V
Sent: 040601/0342Z @:WT3V.#CNJ.NJ.USA.NOAM #:24094 [Lakehurst] $:24094_WT3V
From: KB2VXA@WT3V.#CNJ.NJ.USA.NOAM
To  : INFO@WW

Hi Bob and readers,

I beg to disagree on one point, OE does indeed get rid of spam as easily 
as Mailwasher, however I do agree perhaps not as quickly because MW saves 
download time. Then maybe I could disagree on that too since you have to 
take time to read what you have and decide whether or not to download it. 
I haven't done a time and motion study so I just could be wrong. (;->)

I must however set you and others straight once again about bouncing 
spam. NEVER reply in ANY way to spam, you are only verifying a sucker 
address and inviting even MORE spam! Spammers don't have mail boxes your 
bounces go into so they won't be subject to your puny DoS attack AND the 
addresses they "send" it from are phoney or spoofed. In the latter case 
you're bouncing that spam right into someone else's mailbox, YOU are 
spamming HIM!

Mailwasher may be your "drug of choice" but PLEASE don't bounce, DELETE!

73 de Warren, KB2VXA@WT3V.#CNJ.NJ.USA.NOAM
Powered by JCP&L atomic energy.

E-MAIL: kb2vxa@swissinfo.org

**************************************
Preserve the integrity of our network,
stop Internet forwarding!
**************************************

Message timed by cesium laser: 03:52 on 2004-Jun-01 GMT



Read previous mail | Read next mail


 13.09.2025 10:14:23lGo back Go up