| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 27.09.00 00:54l 201 Lines 7300 Bytes #999 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_263F
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/263F
Path: DB0AAB<DB0RGB<DB0ABH<DB0SRS<DB0ZDF<DB0AIS<DB0NDK<DB0ACH<PI8JOP<PI8ZAA<
PI8HGL
Sent: 000926/2254Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:18408 [Den Haag] FBB $:HD_2000_263F
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 00 19:51:28 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_263F>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
do whatever he wants, as no one you know was "getting into
a crack over it" which I assume to be some reference to the
human posterior. If you don't know, guessing is a bad habit.
"Charles Brabham" says:
> "Richard Lubash" wrote:
> >
> > If I have a packet transceiver operating at my home qth receiving and
> > transmitting APRS information am I then allowed to leave that device
> > operating unattended and activate and operate a mobile APRS rig away
> > from my house. I know I can operate more than one rig when I am present
> > but am curious about the legality of operating from my car while my
> > base station continues to archive APRS info.
> >
> > Any help would be appreciated.
> >
>
> It seems like a moot point to me... You already know your home qth's
> location, which is highly unlikely to change. What point is there in
> transmitting APRS data on a known, fixed location?
>
> Maybe there's a real need there, that I'm having trouble seeing. If there
> is, don't worry about it. Lots of unattended VHF/UHF Packet stations
> transmit, and I've never heard of anyone getting into a crack over it.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 18:56:07 GMT
From: "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw@bde-arc.ampr.org>
Subject: APRS Operating Question
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Charles Brabham wrote:
> "Steve Sampson (K5OKC)" <ssampson@nospam.radio-link.net> wrote in message
> news:ssuhvuomhq3e4d@corp.supernews.com...
> > Charles, APRS stations not only transmit their position, but
> > also digipeat positions and messages of others. It only took
> > me a second to look up the rule. Amateurs should not guess
> > about something which will cause them to be fined or evicted
> > from the bands, therefore your reply seems to advise him to
> > do whatever he wants, as no one you know was "getting into
> > a crack over it" which I assume to be some reference to the
> > human posterior. If you don't know, guessing is a bad habit.
>
> Is this how LandLine Lids such as yourself decide it's "OK" to transmit
> commercial content (and porno, etc) from the Internet over the Ham bands?
..And there we go. Another unprovoked, personal attack by Mr. CB himself.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:12:23 -0500
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@swb.net>
Subject: APRS Operating Question
"Steve Sampson (K5OKC)" <ssampson@nospam.radio-link.net> wrote in message
news:ssuhvuomhq3e4d@corp.supernews.com...
>
> Charles, APRS stations not only transmit their position, but
> also digipeat positions and messages of others. It only took
> me a second to look up the rule. Amateurs should not guess
> about something which will cause them to be fined or evicted
> from the bands, therefore your reply seems to advise him to
> do whatever he wants, as no one you know was "getting into
> a crack over it" which I assume to be some reference to the
> human posterior. If you don't know, guessing is a bad habit.
>
Is this how LandLine Lids such as yourself decide it's "OK" to transmit
commercial content (and porno, etc) from the Internet over the Ham bands?
Just curious. ;-)
--
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
n5pvl@swbell.net
http://home.swbell.net/n5pvl/
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:09:39 -0500
From: "jimmy john" <jj@sandwitch.org>
Subject: APRS Operating Question
Weather data is pretty common, but any number of other data items - not just
lat/long. Maybe you want to send your mobile station some info about your
fixed station (i.e, "you have mail" - mail you don't need while mobile,
"your house is on fire"). The position info is not the "real" payload, and
there is really no limit to what the payload could be (well, stock quotes
would be a bad idea ;-)
> Maybe there's a real need there, that I'm having trouble seeing. If there
> is, don't worry about it. Lots of unattended VHF/UHF Packet stations
> transmit, and I've never heard of anyone getting into a crack over it.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:56:40 -0400
From: "Karl Beckman" <karl.beckman@motorola.com>
Subject: APRS Operating Question
Just re-read Steve's last sentence one more time. Charlie obviously didn't.
--
Karl Beckman WA8NVW
mailto:kbeckman@stratos.net
D. Stussy <kd6lvw@bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.10.10009251855450.746-100000@exp.bde-arc.ampr.org...
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Charles Brabham wrote:
> > "Steve Sampson (K5OKC)" <ssampson@nospam.radio-link.net> wrote in
message
> > news:ssuhvuomhq3e4d@corp.supernews.com...
> > > Charles, APRS stations not only transmit their position, but
> > > also digipeat positions and messages of others. It only took
> > > me a second to look up the rule. Amateurs should not guess
> > > about something which will cause them to be fined or evicted
> > > from the bands, therefore your reply seems to advise him to
> > > do whatever he wants, as no one you know was "getting into
> > > a crack over it" which I assume to be some reference to the
> > > human posterior. If you don't know, guessing is a bad habit.
> >
> > Is this how LandLine Lids such as yourself decide it's "OK" to transmit
> > commercial content (and porno, etc) from the Internet over the Ham
bands?
>
> ...And there we go. Another unprovoked, personal attack by Mr. CB
himself.
>
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 17:24:51 -0500
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@swb.net>
Subject: APRS Operating Question
"D. Stussy" <kd6lvw@bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.10.10009251855450.746-100000@exp.bde-arc.ampr.org...
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Charles Brabham wrote:
>
> snip<
>
> > Is this how LandLine Lids such as yourself decide it's "OK" to transmit
> > commercial content (and porno, etc) from the Internet over the Ham
bands?
>
> ...And there we go. Another unprovoked, personal attack by Mr. CB
himself.
"D. Stussy" appears to be unhappy that I recently pointed out his anti-ham
LandLine Lid rhetoric, and considers my doing so to be an "unprovoked,
personal attack"...
Is he related to Bill Clinton, I wonder?
Then I pointed out the fact that Steve, for all his pretended respect for
the rules, is one of those LandLine Lids who thinks that we should use
Amateur Packet Radio as a way to provide Internet access, despite the fact
that doing so would most certainly lead to illegal content being transmitted
over the Ham bands. - Another "unprovoked, personal attack ", D. Stussy
claims.
Maybe he's related to "Hillary"?
;-)
LandLine Lids such as Steve and D. Stussy "provoke" me to point out their
anti-Ham activities... This is no "attack"... If they are ashamed of what
they are doing and feel "attacked" when it's pointed out, perhaps they
should consider modifying their behavior.
D. Stussy calls me "Mr. CB", but it's him and those of his ilk who have been
indulging in anti-Ham behavior, not me. Perhaps he should give THAT a bit
of thought as well. - If he's up to the job.
--
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
n5pvl@swbell.net
http://home.swbell.net/n5pvl/
--
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_263G
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
