| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 20.09.00 23:28l 185 Lines 6893 Bytes #999 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_254C
Read: DC1TMA GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/254C
Path: DB0AAB<DB0FSG<DB0SL<DB0RGB<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0BRI<DB0HAG<DB0ACH<DB0OVN<
PI8JOP<PI8ZAA<PI8HGL
Sent: 000920/1903Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:16271 [Den Haag] FBB $:HD_2000_254C
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 00 16:39:03 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_254C>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
a refund. I know that ebay is a take your own risk venture -<BR>> but =
deliberately lying about the condition of the radio to sell it =
is<BR>>=20
dishonest. What a disgrace to the ham community. Don't be suckered by=20
this<BR>> man like I was.</FONT></DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D1>
<DIV><BR></FONT><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D4><STRONG>There is a=20
procedure to follow on eBay, and I suggest you follow =
it,</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D4>go read the=20
docs.</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial =
color=3D#0000ff></FONT> </DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0033_01C0201B.D5F23500--
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 22:58:31 GMT
From: "Kenn" <kgeiger10@home.com.stuff.to.respond.remove.stuff>
Subject: Beware of W4WWB
I am deeply disappointed to warn you not to deal with Warren Brooks W4WWB.
He advertised a radio on ebay that was complete, but needed some work. What
arrived was a parts radio - Pieces were missing and it will not power up.
After he ignored my emails I contacted him by phone and in his best good ole
boy drawl he told me " you bought it, you own it". He would not allow me to
return it for a refund. I know that ebay is a take your own risk venture -
but deliberately lying about the condition of the radio to sell it is
dishonest. What a disgrace to the ham community. Don't be suckered by this
man like I was.
Kenn N7QPY
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 04:18:16 -0700
From: Gary Johnson <xpware@home.com>
Subject: eMail Address For KF7XP(XPWare)??
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 15:04:46 GMT, "Your Name"
<SEREIKAS@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>I have sent several emailsl to Gary Johnson(KF7XP), the provider of XPWin
>(XPWare). I can't seem to get a reply(email: xpware@home.com). I got the
>email address from his webpage(http://www.goodnet.com/~gjohnson).
>
>Does anyone know if Gary has a new email address? If so, please let me know.
>
>Thanks much!
>
>George
>K2WO
>
Sure, my email is xpware@home.com. I have been in
Europe on business the last couple of weeks. I will be sifting thru
the emails and get back to you today or tomorrow at the lastest.
73 Gary KF7XP
----------------------------------------------------
www.angelfire.com/az2/glaswerks
www.goodnet.com/~gjohnson
----------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 14:28:44 GMT
From: "Hank Oredson" <horedson@att.net>
Subject: HF multicast protocols.
>"Rob Janssen" <nomail@rob.knoware.nl> wrote in message
>news:slrn8s3lto.qs.nomail@linux.pe1chl.ampr.org...
> Actually the pacsat broadcast protocols are not very tightly coupled to
> AX.25 as a transmission protocol. Any protocol that can transmit delimited
> datagrams could be used as a layer below them.
> Rob
> --
> +----------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
> | Rob Janssen pe1chl@amsat.org | WWW: http://www.knoware.nl/users/rob |
> | AMPRnet: rob@pe1chl.ampr.org | AX.25 BBS: PE1CHL@PI8WNO.#UTR.NLD.EU |
> +----------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
So CLOVER FEC would work ok for that use.
The issue is how to find the 10-15 stations interested in setting up and
network and playing with the protocols. For the original packet network,
it took me more than 9 months, and many hundreds of phone calls and
letters to get things going. Once the first 5 or 6 were signed up, and the
protocol was finalized, it got a bit easier since they helped recruit more
stations :-) I'm not interested in doing that again ...
--
... Hank
http://horedson.home.att.net
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 12:28:47 -0500
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@swb.net>
Subject: HF multicast protocols.
"Hank Oredson" <horedson@att.net> wrote in message
news:wsLw5.31024$M37.769057@bgtnsc07-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
> So CLOVER FEC would work ok for that use.
>
> The issue is how to find the 10-15 stations interested in setting up and
> network and playing with the protocols. For the original packet network,
> it took me more than 9 months, and many hundreds of phone calls and
> letters to get things going. Once the first 5 or 6 were signed up, and the
> protocol was finalized, it got a bit easier since they helped recruit more
> stations :-) I'm not interested in doing that again ...
That's the problem with using CLOVER for this purpose... There are few
owners of CLOVER equipment who would be interested in going into "receive
only" mode for an extended period of time. If somebody came up with a
soundcard compatible CLOVER monitoring program (especially if it worked in
DOS) then you would have a much easier time getting volunteers.
Cathryn's suggestion of using PSK31 sounds much more likely to succeed, for
that reason. There are already hundreds of PSK31 stations out there, and
nobody had to invest big bucks to get any of them up and running. With a
much larger user base to work with, your chances of assembling a decent
startup group rise proportionately.
Multicast's efficiency is directly related to the number of receiving
stations per transmitter. Anything that drives up the number of receiving
stations also drives up multicast's efficiency and utility.
Stick with @WW bulletins. If you start adding lots of nonessential
"goodies", you are throwing away valuable update time and reducing your
ability to move the @WW traffic. Once it's established that you are moving
@WW really well, that would be the time to consider adding or not adding
additional content. Remember that a LandLine Lids' favorite way to undermine
legitimate digital efforts by Hams is to insist upon jacking up the content
level until the system is hopelessly overloaded. - THAT's why the @WW
"problem" got out of hand in the first place! - So stick with @WW only,
despite inevitable pressure from various LandLine Lid types to do otherwise.
--
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
n5pvl@swbell.net
http://home.swbell.net/n5pvl/
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 19:21:31 GMT
From: "Hank Oredson" <horedson@att.net>
Subject: HF multicast protocols.
"Steve Sampson (K5OKC)" <ssampson@nospam.radio-link.net> wrote in message
news:ss7dlifmh3t163@corp.supernews.com...
> Bark! Bark! Bark!
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_254D
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
