OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
PA2AGA > HDDIG    18.08.00 23:38l 232 Lines 6941 Bytes #999 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_224C
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/224C
Path: DB0AAB<DB0SL<DB0RGB<DB0MRW<DB0SON<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0GOS<DB0PKE<DB0OVN<
      PI8JOP<PI8ZAA<PI8HGL
Sent: 000818/2136Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:5715 [Den Haag] FBB $:HD_2000_224C
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To  : HDDIG@EU
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 00 20:22:40 MET

Message-Id: <hd_2000_224C>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B

and zoning commission in a suburban city. In this state covenants are attached
as has been stated, but they are not enforced by any government agency, but
rather by homeowners associations. If a development is sold with covenants,
but
there is no HA created, then those covenants are effectively null and void. A
single neighbor could have the potential for forcing litigation, but then they
likely would have to call into question all violations to the covenants
effectively taking on the whole neighborhood. Not impossible, but not likely.


jack albert wrote:

> Trying to purchase a new house without Antenna restrictions or covenants is
> really difficult and
> I'm a little bit confused on the FCC policies concerning the private
> contractual agreements.
> (I snipped the FCC's comments on a petition that was presented by the ARRL)
>
> I was told by a real-estate agent  that restrictions and covenants are
> similar to leans against the property and
> are held as public record at the County Dead Office.    They are not signed
> by or agreed to by persons that
> purchase the property.  They are adopted by the land developers and I guess
> you can that they are policed
> by the Home Owners Associations!
>
> If I purchase the property and pay cash for it but I don't sign the covenant
> or agreement.  How can that be an
> agreement between two parties and how can I be restricted by the covenants?
>
> -------------SNIP--------------
>
> Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2
> Before the
> Federal Communications Commission
> Washington, D.C. 20554
>
> In the Matter of )
>                  )
>
> Modification and Clarification of Policies and )
> Procedures Governing Siting and Maintenance )                RM-8763
> of Amateur Radio Antennas and Support )
> Structures, and Amendment of Section 97.15 )
> of the Commission's Rules Governing the )
> Amateur Radio Service. )
>
> ORDER
>
> Adopted: November 18, 1999 Released: November 19, 1999
> By the Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau:
>
> -----SNIP---------
> -----SNIP---------
>
> III. Discussion
> 6. The Commission's policy with respect to restrictive covenants is
> clearly stated in the MO&O establishing a limited preemption of state and
> local
> regulations. In the MO&O, the Commission stated that PRB-1 does not reach
> restrictive covenants in private contractual agreements.17 The Petitioner
> argues
> that enforcement of a covenant by the court constitutes "state action", thus
> converting what otherwise would be a private matter into a matter of state
> regulation and, thus, subject to the Commission's limited preemption
> policy.18
> Notwithstanding the clear policy statement that was set forth in PRB-1
> excluding restrictive covenants in private contractual agreements as being
> outside the reach of our limited preemption,19 we nevertheless strongly
> encourage associations of homeowners and private contracting parties to
> follow
> the principle of reasonable accommodation and to apply it to any and all
> instances of amateur service communications where they may be involved.
> Although we do not hesitate to offer such encouragement, we are not
> persuaded
> by the Petition or the comments in support thereof that specific rule
> provisions bringing the private restrictive covenants within the ambit of
> PRB-1
> are necessary or appropriate at this time. Having reached this conclusion,
> we
> need not resolve the issue of whether, or under what circumstances, judicial
> enforcement of private covenants would constitute "state action."
>
> -----SNIP---------

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:11:51 -0500
From: jason <jason@digitalidiots.com>
Subject: Digital Video

Digital Video FLASH tutorials

http://www.digitalidiots.com

Guide to digital filmmaking
with hundreds of DV tutorials

Enjoy!
http://www.digitalidiots.com

Jason Tugman
Founder/Chief Idiot
Digitalidiots.com
Guide to DV Filmmaking

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:59:04 GMT
From: amx@i.am
Subject: MIXW32

Hello!

In article <398892cf$1@zfree.co.nz>,
  "Jim" <zl2bmh@zfree.co.nz> wrote:
>
> I am having difficulty in getting MIXW32 (used for PSK31, RTTY,
Packet etc)
> to transmit.  Has anybody had this trouble and how did you correct it.
>

 You can try TrueTTY at http://www.dxsoft.com also.

WBR,
Sergei




Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 13:14:37 GMT
From: k8cpa@arrl.net (chuck)
Subject: NEW! PSK31 Mailing list!

Hi All,


Seeing the "other" PSK31 Mailing list is very unrealiable, and all but
disappeared, I have started one here in the states... go to
Http://psk31.listbot.com or http://www.qsl.net/k8cpa/psk31.htm and
sign up!

there are 102 people on there as of last night... 

Everyone is welcome!

and BTW: I did get my kenwood ts-950sdx going on psk31... have worked
alot of stateside and a few countries... Worked XE1M last night on 20!


-Chuck K8CPA

Talk around the world....LEGALLY!
http://www.arrl.org/hamradio.html

How do you get your ham Ticket?
http://www.arrl.org/fastrak.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:12:44 -0500
From: "Rick Ruhl" <ricker@cssincorp.com>
Subject: PK232MBX - 25 - 9 pin serial lead help pse.

Jim,

All you need is a standard 9 to 25 pin connector.. you can get them at any
electroics store, or even radio shack. It's the same pinout as an external
modem is.


"Tracy Dunne" <tracy@pearman-xstitch.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:8n1inn$iub$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...
> I have recently changed my PC and am having problems with my TNC. My old
PC
> had a 25 pin serial port, while my new one has 9 pin serial ports. Could
> anybody supply the info for wiring a 25 pin lead to a 9 pin pleae. I need
> pins 1 - 8 and 20 on the 25 pin (TNC end) to be connected. What pins do
> these relate to on the 9 pin (PC) end.
>
> Many thanks
>
> Jim Dunne G0UPG
>
>

------------------------------

Date: 17 Aug 2000 07:46:13 GMT
From: hrbcrb@aol.com.goaway (KF6HHS)
Subject: Portable -  TNC / Radio

Hello John

You did not mention what/why use of the TNC.  Are you going to use it for
packet, APRS, or?  There may be some options depending on your intended use
and
may reduce the size/weight of the radio/TNC you need to pack.

Regards, Hugh  KF6HHS
Retired, now life moves at my pace.
please note spam filter

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:24:12 -0700
From: "Jim Grosswon" <grosswon@hotmail.com>
Subject: Portable -  TNC / Radio

Hi All - I am relatively new to ham radio.  I am about to purchase my first
setup and wanted get some advice on the follow products.  I would like to


To be continued in digest: hd_2000_224D





Read previous mail | Read next mail


 31.12.2025 20:03:28lGo back Go up