| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 08.08.00 00:44l 209 Lines 6619 Bytes #999 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_205D
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/205D
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0BRI<DB0SIF<DB0AIS<DB0ME<DB0OVN<PI8JOP<
PI8ZAA<PI8HGL
Sent: 000807/2254Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:3179 [Den Haag] FBB $:HD_2000_205D
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 00 14:17:45 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_205D>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
are
now! So, can you afford $6.00 and see if it really works? I think so...
People have said, "What if the plan is played out and no one sends you
the
money? So what! What are the chances of that happening when there are
tons
of new honest users and new honest people who are joining the internet
and
newsgroups everyday and are willing to give it a try? Estimates are at
20,000 to 50,000 new users, everyday, with thousands of those joining
the
actual Internet. REMEMBER, play FAIRLY and HONESTLY and this will
really
work. The possibilities can be endless...You will never know, unless
you
give it a try... otherwise, it will always be "what if."
GOOD LUCK!
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 00:50:44 GMT
From: "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw@bde-arc.ampr.org>
Subject: Morse Code over the Internet.
On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, LCC wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 20:34:18 -0700, Robert Casey
> <wa2ise@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >Maybe create a newsgroup "reader" that outputs morse code on the computer's
> >speakers?
> >Learn code while keeping up with the flame wars of r.r.a.m and r.r.a.p!
> >:-)
>
> You've got an idea there. I wonder if modems could have
> intercommunicated with CW. Isn't the sound you hear
> from your modem actually some form of FSK? Data?
> Or is it closer in lineage to packet?
Believe it or not, the Hayes 1200B modems came with morse code ability. Look
in one of the appendices. I think one could take the modem "off-hook" by
issuing ATH2, which put the modem in "transmit mode" (and shorted the second
pair of wires together), and then periods and dashes sent to it came out as
code. At the end of the transmission, one had to issue a special command to
keep it "off-hook" but otherwise disconnect it (i.e. "receive mode"). Too bad
that it didn't actually receive the code too.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 05:07:37 GMT
From: "Davev" <dvari@adelphia.net>
Subject: Phoenix s.e. help
My Phoenix SE seems to be doing a lot of retries on the RX side.Anybody know
what/where i need
to tweek?
tnx de dave-n2rhl
------------------------------
Date: 30 Jul 2000 00:01:15 GMT
From: johnl84238@aol.com (JOHNL84238)
Subject: PK232 Proms
Anybody got a recent set of the PK232 PROMs (firmware)?? I hate to pay
$50 for the latest rev just to try out packet....since there apparently isn't
much activity.....but I'd like to try it out before I spend the $50 to
Timewave
for the latest ones.....a rev back or so should still work I would
think....anyone
got any they replaced??? I got my PK232 w/o any PROMs somehow.
Thanks,
John
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 23:15:09 -0400
From: "Rob" <Pse@NoEmail.Com>
Subject: PK232 Proms
I thought all the versions of PK232 firmware supported packet. Your PK-232
should already do packet. Give it a try!!
I suspect that you are really referring to Pactor not packet. Yes, you will
likely need the latest firmware from Timewave for Pactor.
I have heard that the PK-232 firmware from Timewave works well in Pactor.
(But I can't tell you from first hand experience since I do not have a
PK-232).
By the way, there is a lot of Pactor 1 activity on HF. Many Hams still use
Pactor to access BBS's on HF (though some Ham's have upgraded to Pactor II
by buying the PTC II or PTC IIe from SCS). You cannot upgrade the PK-232 to
Pactor II.
73's
Rob
"JOHNL84238" <johnl84238@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000729200115.03067.00000071@ng-fg1.aol.com...
> Anybody got a recent set of the PK232 PROMs (firmware)?? I hate to pay
> $50 for the latest rev just to try out packet....since there apparently
isn't
> much activity.....but I'd like to try it out before I spend the $50 to
Timewave
> for the latest ones.....a rev back or so should still work I would
> think....anyone
> got any they replaced??? I got my PK232 w/o any PROMs somehow.
> Thanks,
> John
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 12:09:48 -0400
From: "Rob" <Pse@NoEmail.Com>
Subject: psk31 and vox
It is much better to use an opto isolator to key the PTT line.
(for such a circuit, see www.qsl.net/wm2u)
If you use a transistor, you will defeat the purpose of using audio
isolation transformers on the audio lines to and from the sound card.
Rob
"Den" <dennis.spiess@reckitt.com> wrote in message
news:8kutch$j4c$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> In article <8knshs$u89$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> ki8fb@my-deja.com wrote:
> > can you use vox to transmit on psk31? when ever i try to use the
> serial
> > port the radio stays keyed up. so i thought maybe i could use the vox
> > in the radio. any ideas?
> > 73
> > Kevin
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Before you buy.
> >
> PTT / serial port is MUCH more reliable... be sure and isolate the rig
> via a transistor (2n222) or optical isolator. Both circuits are widely
> published on the net.
> I also found that an on/off switch at the computer end helps to keep
> the serial port from keying the xmitter when booting or running other
> software.
> (I actually switch out the PTT and both audio lines.... nice to be able
> to disconect the to pieces of equipment!)
> 73
> Den Spiess W2DEN -.-
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 15:34:37 -0500
From: "Steve Sampson" <ssampson@usa-site.net>
Subject: RigBlaster
Wow! It's like you're a fortune teller!! Can you also talk to the dead?
"Rob" <Pse@NoEmail.Com> wrote
> What did I say?? Someone would sell a less expensive unit for around $50
> that provides better isolation than RigBlaster!
>
> Rob
------------------------------
Date: (null)
From: "Rob" <Pse@NoEmail.Com>
Subject: Re: RigBlaster
Lines: 134
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300
Message-ID: <OjDg5.38851$qS3.79598@tor-nn1.netcom.ca>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 12:06:51 -0400
X-Complaints-To: abuse@netcom.ca
X-Trace: tor-nn1.netcom.ca 964886894 216.123.34.193 (Sat, 29 Jul 2000 12:08:14
EDT)
Organization: Netcom Canada
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_205E
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
