| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 01.06.00 03:32l 243 Lines 7372 Bytes #-9462 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_152B
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/152B
Path: DB0AAB<DB0SL<DB0RGB<DB0MRW<DB0SON<DB0ERF<DB0SHG<DB0SM<PI8DAZ<PI8GCB<
PI8HGL
Sent: 000531/2312Z @:PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU #:46047 [Den Haag] FBB $:HD_2000_152B
From: PA2AGA@PI8HGL.#ZH1.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 00 00:21:13 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_152B>
From: pa2aga@pe1mvx.ampr.org
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga.ampr.org
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
> etc. They are simply not very durable.
>
> I thought one of the purposes of WINLINK was to allow portable stations to
> send and receive Internet EMAIL. I guess it was really designed for more
> permanent portable stations (like Marine Mobile). What a PITY!
>
> 73's
> Rob
>
> Perhaps
> "Jerry Flanders" <jflanders2@home.com> wrote in message
> news:39333958.373843085@news...
> > On April 23, k4cjx announced that WL2K will now work in the ASCII
> > mode, which allows cheapie PACTOR-enabled PK-232 (or the MFJ ????
> > model) controllers to work. See:
> >
> >
>
http://www.listbot.com/cgi-bin/subscriber?Act=view_message&list_id=winnnet&m
> sg_num=741&start_num=758
> >
> > for his announcement posted to the WinLink/NetLink mailing list
> >
> > Binary transfers are apparently not a requirement. I had put my old
> > PK-232 on the shelf and obtained a KAM+ in order to use WinLink, not
> > realizing that PK-232 support was imminent. Wish I had waited a bit!
> >
> > Jerry W4UK
> >
> > On Mon, 29 May 2000 21:23:08 -0500, Seth Miller
> > <sethmiller73@email.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Mike,
> > >
> > >It was not SCS that made the decision to support only binary mode
> transfers,
> > >rather it was the WinLink 2000 authors.
> > >
> > >It is unfortunate that PacComm didn't implement a binary transfer mode
> (which is
> > >the problem in your case, and not Pactor I vs. Pactor II issue). Other
> > >manufacturer's Pactor I TNC's (Kantronics, AEA, etc.) are supported by
> > >AirMail/WinLink. This issue has no relationship to SCS and/or the
PTC-II
> series
> > >- if you want to be bitter at least aim it at the right manufacturer.
> > >
> > >- Seth
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Mike Pupeza wrote:
> > >
> > >> Well Gang;
> > >>
> > >> I said it would happen! My favorite Pactor WinLink BBS N0ZO in Lady
> Lake,
> > >> Florida will no longer talk to me.
> > >> Reason! I don't run the AirMail 2000 program!
> > >> I want to, but CAN'T!
> > >> My TNC - a PacComm PacTOR CONTROLLER, which is totally PTC-1
> Compliant - the
> > >> ORIGINAL and STARTER of the whole Pactor scene, is INCOMPATIBLE, and
> NOT
> > >> SUPPORTED by the AirMail 2000 program!
> > >> Guys, I bought this NEW in February of 1999 - it's not OLD!
> > >>
> > >> Also, I have a Mac I-book, for which there is no support! And I know
> people
> > >> who run Linux!
> > >>
> > >> So here I go again, bitching! But, c'mon!
> > >>
> > >> I hope that there are some changes in PSK-31 that'll allow error
> checking
> > >> and correction that'll make these PTC-II and IIe controllers as
useful
> as
> > >> Commodore 64's, in todays world!
> > >>
> > >> Off my chest! Thanks!
> > >> --
> > >> Mike Pupeza VE3EQP
> > >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 13:55:57 +0100
From: Ian Wade <Ian.Wade@care4free.net>
Subject: Calling New Zealand
I will be in New Zealand later this year and plan to run APRS there. Can
anyone point me to a source of NZ maps (ideally on CD so I can make my
own).
Thanks
73
Ian, G3NRW
Technical Editor, APRS Protocol Specification
********* Third draft now available *********
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| APRS on 144.800 [IO91SX] ~55km/35 miles NNW of London |
| email: g3nrw@arrl.net |
| |
| APRS PROTOCOL SPEC: http://www.tapr.org/tapr/html/Faprswg.html|
| APRS DECODER: http://www.netro.co.uk/aprs.htm |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 15:48:06 -0400
From: "Greg Carey" <gandicarey@erols.com>
Subject: Corrected Email Address (Using Digipan 1.1 to Key Kenwood Radio)
Error in email address in original posted message. Correct email address is
<gandicarey@erols.com>
Tnx, 73
Greg, KN4EL
Thanks for replies.
> De Greg, KN4EL
>
> I've been enjoying the fascinating world of PSK31 for all of 2 weeks. I
use
> RCP (Kenwood's Radio Control Program) to control a Kenwood 570S. This
> program works flawlessly, but after setting Digipan up to use the same
com
> port that works for RCP (I don't use the two programs concurrently),
> Digipan still does not switch the radio over to transmit. My guess is
that
> Digipan does not use scripting (e.g., reg4=0;if(tx) rx; else tx;) for
> transmitting?
>
> Currently, I'm using audio from PC speakers and VOX on radio to transmit
> PSK31. High pitched worbles used to sound nice, but the novelty has worn
> off with self, XYL and harmonics. :-). Using the ACC plug at the back
of
> radio for audio (I/O) and getting Digipan to switch TXing would be bliss!
>
> Looking forward to hear from anyone who has been able to use Digipan to
key
> similar Kenwood radios, especially via serial port, PC side to DB9
> connector, radio side.
>
> Tnx, 73
> Greg, Silver Spring MD
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 08:55:09 -0400
From: Jim Lynch <jwl@sgi.com>
Subject: DCC for 2000
Is there going to be a DCC for 2000? Where? TAPR doesn't mention it on
their site as far as I could see.
Thanks,
Jim.
------------------------------
Date: 30 May 2000 15:18:57 GMT
From: nielsen@primenet.com (Bob Nielsen)
Subject: DCC for 2000
http://www.tapr.org/dcc/ says:
ARRL and TAPR Digital Communications Conference
2000 (Exact date to be determined)
Orlando, FL (tentative)
Full details and registration information will appear when available
On Tue, 30 May 2000 08:55:09 -0400, Jim Lynch wrote:
>Is there going to be a DCC for 2000? Where? TAPR doesn't mention it on
>their site as far as I could see.
>
>Thanks,
>Jim.
--
Bob Nielsen, N7XY nielsen@primenet.com
Bainbridge Island, WA http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 07:51:50 -0400
From: "Bob Lewis" <aa4pb@erols.com>
Subject: DigiPan Receive Audio Hint Needed
Unless you don't have enough drive from the receiver, the sound card
line input is the place to inject the receive signal. Mike inputs are
often more noisy. If you're getting blue speckles from the receiver
noise then you have the correct level.
PSK31 is very sensitive to phase changes caused by propogation. It is
sometimes possible (especially with signals coming over the poles) to
have a very strong, clean sounding signal that will not print at all.
Tuning is also very critical. Make sure the AFC is turned on in the
software. Get the tuning as close as you can as quickly as you can and
then "hands off" the dial to let the AFC do the fine tune. I leave the
speaker on during the tune process as the tones help me in tuning the
signal in.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 02:27:43 GMT
From: "Mont O'Leary" <moleary@rbci.com>
Subject: DSP settings for PSK31
Any suggestions for DSP settings for PSK31? I am using WinPSK and have a
Timewave DSP-59Y (which is the same as their DSP-599+). I have been using
it in voice mode with High Pass set to 100 Hz and Low Pass set to 2200 Hz.
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_152C
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
