| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 08.04.00 07:52l 252 Lines 7406 Bytes #-9520 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_92C
Read: DL6KCF GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/92C
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0WTS<DB0ME<ON6AR<PI8HWB<PI8VAD<
PI8HGL<PI8VNW
Sent: 000402/0100Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:60077 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g24
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA32131 ; Sat, 01 Apr 00 20:17:46 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.70/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00000146 ; Sat, 01 Apr 2000 15:33:28 MET
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 00 15:17:59 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_92C>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 2000/92C
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
> > > > Upper Class
> > > >
> > > > What do we use to distinguish each class?
> > >
> > > Common sense...and appropriate qualifying exams...
> > > Three classes can't do it!
> > > Please read my post titled "Partitions for Reconsideration of
New
> > Ham
> > > Rules". I am not alone in thinking that the basis and purpose of
> > Ham
> > > Radio says that it is a TECHNICAL HOBBY. I don't expect all hams
to
> > be
> > > technical experts BUT I would like to think that some Hams may
be
> > more
> > > qualified in that direction than others. For Ham Radio to get
> > respect
> > > (not just an ego boost for individual's self esteem) we need
more
> > Hams
> > > to be technically qualified at the higher levels of modern
> > > communication technology.
> > >
> > > Hams need MORE license classes,
> > > Bob Wex w2ilp (Initiating License Philosophy)
> > >
> > >
> Sorry guys...Further posts relating to this thread might better
belong
> on rec.radio.amateur.policy.
> Bob Wex,w2ilp (I'll Label Posts)
> -----------------------------------------
> Honesty is the best policy.
> --Dick Tracy--
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 06:28:57 -0800
From: "Johnny Rico" <lawdog2@ibm.net>
Subject: DSP upgrades to PK232MBX
I used the PK-232 (pre-DSP upgrade) and a Kam + for many QSOs. In my
opinion the PK-232 was clearly better on Pactor (the only digital mode
other than PSK31 that I do a lot of)... I would assign a Kam with a
failing grade as regards Pactor, while the PK-232 was maybe a C+/B-.
The SCS PTC-II is an "A".
--
Roger J. Buffington
W6VZV; w6vzv@arrl.net
____________________
Visit my QRZ page: http://www.qrz.com/callsign.html?callsign=w6vzv
Visit my photo page: http://www.photopoint.com/users/U185957.html
"Politicians are the same the world over...
They promise to build bridges, even where there are no rivers."
-- Nikita Khruschev
"Robert Walling" <r-walling1@ti.com> wrote in message
news:8bubqr$d79$1@tilde.csc.ti.com...
> I have a PK232MBX that I bought back in 1992, and it lacked Pactor
> capability. I bought the upgrade to enable pactor and the DSP. It
seems to
> work better in situations where there is high noise or qrm. It was
worth
> the money for me because very few stations use Amtor these days, and
Pactor
> is very popular. I've never owned any other TNC so I can't really
make
> comparisons, but I'm satisfied with the performance of my Timewave
TNC, and
> have made plenty of DX contacts with my 100watts and dipole.
>
> Bob KD7EX
>
>
> Allen Underdown wrote in message ...
> >Has anyone done this upgrade? Did it substanially
> >increase performance of the siam mode or any of the
> >HF modes? Do you feel it was worth the money?
> >
> >I have a new style board and 7.0 software (w pactor).
> >
> >Thanks!
> >Allen - N0GOM
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:47:16 -0500
From: "Victor" <ke4qjk@qsl.net>
Subject: FA: ICOM UT-106 DSP module
For auction:
ICOM UT-106 DSP add-on module for IC-706 & IC-706 MKII.
Check it out at:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=297153403
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:52:51 -0500
From: "Victor" <ke4qjk@qsl.net>
Subject: FS: Astron Power Supply transformers
For sale:
Astron power supply transformers
(1) from an Astron RS-20M
(1) from an Astron RS-35M
I replaced the standard 110v transformers in two Astron power supplies
with switchable 110-220v transformers. The transformers which were replaced
are now available. They are in perfect operating order, run quietly (these
are not hummers!)
RS-20 transformer: 110v ac primary, 34v (no load) ac secondary with
center-tap. This transformer is capable of a continuous 16A cont. 20A
intermittent current draw. There is a also another secondary winding, 44v ac
but I don't know how much amperage draw is capable from it. $18
RS-35 transformer: 110v ac primary, 34v (no load) ac secondary with
center-tap. This transformer is capable of 25A cont., 35A
intermittent current draw. There is a also another secondary winding, 44v ac
but I don't know how much amperage draw is capable from it. $25
Either (or both) would make a perfect replacement for your existing supply,
a great addition for the hobbyist or 'built it yourselfer'!
Buyer would pay shipping from S. FL 33478
Vic, KE4QJK
ke4qjk@qsl.net
------------------------------
Date: 23 Mar 2000 18:34:07 GMT
From: lucafernicola@aol.com (Luca Fernicola)
Subject: HELP!!! I need the frequency of radio Gambia!!!
Hi !!!
I´m a boy from Germany and I need a this frequency of radio Gambia for school.
Perhaps the digital frequency or one with I can received that.
Me would make happy if you answer me!!
Cu
Luca
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:25:49 +0100
From: "Buffalo Joe" <joe@g4wjr.freeserve.co.uk>
Subject: Help - JVCOMM32 installation problems
Hello all,
I have downloaded JVCOMM32 from the JVCOMM website but I am having a bit of
a problem running the program.
When I start the program I get a message telling me that the exe file is
corrupted and that this was most probably caused by a virus. I have run
McAfee Virusscan and tried to re-install the program but still get the same
problem.
Any help on solving this problem would be appreciated. Please reply to
joe@g4wjr.freeserve.co.uk
Cheers - Joe, G4WJR
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 21:48:07 +0200
From: I-am-your-president <president@blackhouse.gov>
Subject: Help - JVCOMM32 installation problems
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:25:49 +0100, "Buffalo Joe"
<joe@g4wjr.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I have downloaded JVCOMM32 from the JVCOMM website but I am having a bit of
>a problem running the program.
>
>When I start the program I get a message telling me that the exe file is
>corrupted and that this was most probably caused by a virus. I have run
>McAfee Virusscan and tried to re-install the program but still get the same
>problem.
>
>Any help on solving this problem would be appreciated. Please reply to
>joe@g4wjr.freeserve.co.uk
>
>Cheers - Joe, G4WJR
>
>
You have to download it again.
The program has an integrity check built into it,
a virus may be the cause,
or if somebody tries to change the exe,
the check routine will give a virus alarm.
Bad times for crackers :-)
p
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 08:06:35 -0500
From: no.spam@no.junk.mail.net
Subject: Help with question about MFJ 1270
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000 20:09:11 -0700, "John Burch" <occupant@enetis.net> wrote:
>How do you access one of these TNCs via the computer port with a Win98
>computer? I have been told that the TNC can only talk to a DOS-based
>machine... Help! Any assistance would be really appreciated.
>Thanks for reading
>John
Not that it matters but a win98 machine IS a dos-based machine.
As to what OS is required for 'talking' to the tnc, someone gave you wrong
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_92D
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
