| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 08.04.00 07:27l 266 Lines 6837 Bytes #-9521 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_91B
Read: DL6KCF GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/91B
Path: DB0AAB<DB0SL<DB0RGB<DB0ABH<DB0SRS<DB0ZDF<DB0AIS<DB0NDK<DB0ACH<PI8JOP<
PI8ZAA<PI8GCB<PI8HGL<PI8VNW
Sent: 000401/1557Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:60072 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g24
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA32126 ; Sat, 01 Apr 00 15:09:44 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.70/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00000131 ; Sat, 01 Apr 2000 15:32:40 MET
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 00 15:17:41 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_91B>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 2000/91B
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
wrote:
>Does anyone know of another software program for running PSK31 that compares
>with Digipan? Just curious. Dale , WA5GVE
I'm not sure what you mean "compares with Digipan".
What attributes or features are you really looking for?
For example, WinPSK (and its offshoot WinPSKse, which is my attempt at adding
features to WinPSK, mainly the ability to deal with two receive signals at
once) has really good DSP and seems to be able to handle much weaker signals
than some other programs.
Logger has significantly fancier logging and handles PSK31 decently.
Pointers to these, and others can be found at www.psk31.com, as well as
possibly other sites.
Dave, ka1dt ka1dt@arrl.net
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 07:47:59 -0500
From: "Bob Lewis" <aa4pb@erols.com>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
> How can we have more classes and reduce government cost?
Since the government doesn't write the question pool and they don't
give the exams, how does more classes result in a significant increase
in government costs?
> Why should all Americans subsidize Ham radio? What do they get?
Hopefully, they get a pool of trained operators and equipment which is
available in an emergency. If the FCC were permitted to charge a
reasonable fee and keep the money to supplement their budget, perhaps
their amateur operation could become self-supporting.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 08:01:48 -0600
From: "Steve Sampson" <ssampson@usa-site.net>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
I would estimate that changes to the CFR (due to lawyers, meetings,
travel, publishing, etc) are in the hundreds of dollars per hour.
I'm just guessing, but I know it isn't free, or done by volunteers.
> > How can we have more classes and reduce government cost?
>
> Since the government doesn't write the question pool and they don't
> give the exams, how does more classes result in a significant increase
> in government costs?
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 07:05:17 -0800
From: "Johnny Rico" <lawdog2@ibm.net>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
Can't we keep this license class crap off of digital -- policy is the
place for it.
--
Roger J. Buffington
W6VZV; w6vzv@arrl.net
____________________
Visit my QRZ page: http://www.qrz.com/callsign.html?callsign=w6vzv
Visit my photo page: http://www.photopoint.com/users/U185957.html
"Politicians are the same the world over...
They promise to build bridges, even where there are no rivers."
-- Nikita Khruschev
"Bob Wex w2ilp" <w2ilp@juno.com> wrote in message
news:8buba0$boi$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> In article <sdb93hsslul64@corp.supernews.com>,
> "Steve Sampson" <ssampson@usa-site.net> wrote:
> > "Bob Wex w2ilp" wrote
> >
> > > Hams need more license classes to maintain their basis and
purpose
> of
> > > being state of the art communicators and capable of forming a
cadre
> of
> > > experts!
> >
> > OK, how about:
> >
> > Lower class
> > Middle Class
> > Upper Class
> >
> > What do we use to distinguish each class?
>
> Common sense...and appropriate qualifying exams...
> Three classes can't do it!
> Please read my post titled "Partitions for Reconsideration of New
Ham
> Rules". I am not alone in thinking that the basis and purpose of
Ham
> Radio says that it is a TECHNICAL HOBBY. I don't expect all hams to
be
> technical experts BUT I would like to think that some Hams may be
more
> qualified in that direction than others. For Ham Radio to get
respect
> (not just an ego boost for individual's self esteem) we need more
Hams
> to be technically qualified at the higher levels of modern
> communication technology.
>
> Hams need MORE license classes,
> Bob Wex w2ilp (Initiating License Philosophy)
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 13:17:59 -0600
From: Stan Evans <sevans@ou.edu>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
No, it's impossible. Use your kill file, or
unsubscribe.
Johnny Rico wrote:
>
> Can't we keep this license class crap off of digital -- policy is the
> place for it.
>
> --
>
> Roger J. Buffington
> W6VZV; w6vzv@arrl.net
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 13:16:50 -0600
From: Stan Evans <sevans@ou.edu>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
With 5 trillion in debt, there's one thing you can't
bankrupt, and that is the Government :-)
Charles Brabham wrote:
>
> > I'm just guessing, but I know it isn't free, or done by volunteers.
> >
>
> Yes, that's why the FCC was almost bankrupted by the recent
> restructuring.
>
> Not!
>
> --
>
> Charles Brabham, N5PVL
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:35:28 -0600
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@texoma.net>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
Steve Sampson <ssampson@usa-site.net> wrote in message
news:se6nh5r3ni7112@corp.supernews.com...
> I would estimate that changes to the CFR (due to lawyers, meetings,
> travel, publishing, etc) are in the hundreds of dollars per hour.
>
> I'm just guessing, but I know it isn't free, or done by volunteers.
>
Yes, that's why the FCC was almost bankrupted by the recent restructuring.
Not!
--
Charles Brabham, N5PVL
N5PVL @ N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
http://www.texoma.net/~n5pvl
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:05:47 GMT
From: K0HB <k0hb@my-deja.com>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
"Johnny Rico" <lawdog2@ibm.net> wrote:
> Can't we keep this license class crap off of digital -- policy is the
> place for it.
>
> --
>
> Roger J. Buffington
> W6VZV; w6vzv@arrl.net
> "Politicians are the same the world over...
> They promise to build bridges, even where there are no rivers."
> -- Nikita Khruschev
Can't we keep this political crap off of digital -- alt.whine.politics
is the place for it.
73, Hans, K0HB
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 19:33:20 GMT
From: Bob Wex w2ilp <w2ilp@juno.com>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
In article <38e36e3b_2@news1.prserv.net>,
"Johnny Rico" <lawdog2@ibm.net> wrote:
> Can't we keep this license class crap off of digital -- policy is the
> place for it.
>
> --
>
> Roger J. Buffington
> W6VZV; w6vzv@arrl.net
> ____________________
>
> Visit my QRZ page: http://www.qrz.com/callsign.html?callsign=w6vzv
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_91C
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
