| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 23.03.00 10:50l 237 Lines 7376 Bytes #-9538 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_80B
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/80B
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<DB0MRW<DB0ERF<DB0FBB<DB0GOS<DB0PKE<DB0QS<DB0ME<ON6AR<
PI8HWB<PI8HGL<PE1MVX<PE1NMB<EA7URC<PE0MAR<PI8VNW
Sent: 000323/0441Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:58798 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g24
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA31728 ; Thu, 23 Mar 00 03:54:26 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.70/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00018475 ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 19:11:36 MET
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 00 19:09:31 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_80B>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 2000/80B
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
10-30MHZ range. I put about 24 or so toroids, snap on chokes etc on
the various cables with little effect on the rfi. Short of un-doing
the changes, can anyone suggest things that can be done to help reduce
the crud so the radio (a kenwood TS440S ) is usable and I don't see
spikes every 78hz??
thanks
John,ve3sjv
jclind@sentex.net
>.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 14:54:32 GMT
From: "Ross" <homey@spam.com>
Subject: tnc software
Hello this is more of a response to Rick Ruhl, I was one that responded who
forgot to add real email address do to spam problems. I did make a mistake
as far as PKterm I thought they said Pacterm98. Sorry about that
rrslater@mnsinc.com
"Jim Donohue" <jim_donohue@computer.org> wrote in message
news:sd8n614qlul39@corp.supernews.com...
> Rick accurately portrays my position with the exception that I run ham
stuff
> exclusively under Windows 98 and have not tried his package because I am
> sufficiently happy with XPWare that I do not choose to go through the pain
> of adopting a new solution - his PKTerm may be wonderful - but XPWare does
> all I want with consistency.
>
> Jim KO6MH
>
> Rick Ruhl <ricker@cssincorp.com> wrote in message
> news:J7YA4.14400$511.3364003@tw11.nn.bcandid.com...
> > I'd like to bring everyone up to date on my follow ups with users of the
> > newsgroup with this subject.
> >
> > I've written emails to the four people that has responded to Gene's
> request
> > to find out why they recommended XPWare or PkTerm. First, I'd like to
> thank
> > both Jim and Roger for responding and clarifying that they weren't
> > recommending it OVER PKterm, but just recommending it since they have
> never
> > used PKterm and just liked XPWin..
> >
> > Also, as I've written here before, when it comes to Windows 3.x based
> > software,. XPWare is the way to go. PKTerm and Pacterm 98 are 32 bit
> > software programs that don't run under Windows 3.x.
> >
> > As for the other two emails, one bounced because of a fake email address
> and
> > the other never responded publicly or privately to line he wrote that
said
> > PkTerm = buggy. If I don't get information about issues, I can only
> assume
> > they never existed, or it was because of the lack of knowledge of how
> proper
> > Windows based software works.
> >
> > CSS is dedicated to making the best ham radio software at a fair price.
> The
> > only way to do this is to get the input of everyone we can, on how to
> > continually improve the product. And I thank every one who has done
this
> > so far.. your input is so valuable to us.
> >
> > --
> > Rick Ruhl
> > President, Creative Services Software
> > http://www.cssincorp.com
> >
> >
> > "Jim Donohue" <jim_donohue@computer.org> wrote in message
> > news:sd88n0gkfja115@corp.supernews.com...
> > > And yet another vote for XPWARE after a couple of years of use. Jim
> > KO6MH
> > > Tony H <tonysez@ncweb.com> wrote in message
> > > news:cf3vcsc4fr819qo3a5moau1c4uiolib78q@4ax.com...
> > > > On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 00:06:47 -0600, "genno" <wm9h@execpc.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >what is a good software to use with the DSP232. I'm using PCPAKRATT
> II
> > > now
> > > > >but know there are alot better ones out there. So far I have been
> told
> > > that
> > > > >PKTERM99 and XPWARE FOR WINDOWS. Which of those two are better .
> > > > >thanks...GENE/WM9H
> > > > >
> > > > >wm9h@execpc.com
> > > > >
> > > > >PKTerm+Buggy
> > > > Use Xpware
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 03:50:01 GMT
From: "Rick Ruhl" <ricker@cssincorp.com>
Subject: tnc software
I'd like to bring everyone up to date on my follow ups with users of the
newsgroup with this subject.
I've written emails to the four people that has responded to Gene's request
to find out why they recommended XPWare or PkTerm. First, I'd like to thank
both Jim and Roger for responding and clarifying that they weren't
recommending it OVER PKterm, but just recommending it since they have never
used PKterm and just liked XPWin..
Also, as I've written here before, when it comes to Windows 3.x based
software,. XPWare is the way to go. PKTerm and Pacterm 98 are 32 bit
software programs that don't run under Windows 3.x.
As for the other two emails, one bounced because of a fake email address and
the other never responded publicly or privately to line he wrote that said
PkTerm = buggy. If I don't get information about issues, I can only assume
they never existed, or it was because of the lack of knowledge of how proper
Windows based software works.
CSS is dedicated to making the best ham radio software at a fair price. The
only way to do this is to get the input of everyone we can, on how to
continually improve the product. And I thank every one who has done this
so far.. your input is so valuable to us.
--
Rick Ruhl
President, Creative Services Software
http://www.cssincorp.com
"Jim Donohue" <jim_donohue@computer.org> wrote in message
news:sd88n0gkfja115@corp.supernews.com...
> And yet another vote for XPWARE after a couple of years of use. Jim
KO6MH
> Tony H <tonysez@ncweb.com> wrote in message
> news:cf3vcsc4fr819qo3a5moau1c4uiolib78q@4ax.com...
> > On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 00:06:47 -0600, "genno" <wm9h@execpc.com> wrote:
> >
> > >what is a good software to use with the DSP232. I'm using PCPAKRATT II
> now
> > >but know there are alot better ones out there. So far I have been told
> that
> > >PKTERM99 and XPWARE FOR WINDOWS. Which of those two are better .
> > >thanks...GENE/WM9H
> > >
> > >wm9h@execpc.com
> > >
> > >PKTerm+Buggy
> > Use Xpware
> >
>
>
>.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 12:40:57 -0500
From: "Byron Devine" <byrdev@bestonline.net>
Subject: WinCE APRS Beta is here.
he i dowloaded it but i dont know were you got the maps for this thing yet
and what kind of tnc do you have it
on i was thinking of operating a desktop station with my dual band radio on
uhf i think it will work
but i still need the map overlay file tnx byron 73 have a cool day
RalphMW <ralphmw@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000316105453.22003.00002239@ng-cd1.aol.com...
> For those of us that have been waiting for APRS for our Windows CE
handheld
> PC's, the Beta version is out & working. You can download it at:
>
> ftp://ftp.tapr.org/aprssig/wince/
>
> I put it on my venerable old Casio Casiopiea A-10 ( with 4MB memory,
Windows CE
> 2.2, & 8 MB storage card). It works nice. The program itself has to go
into
> regular memory storage but the maps can all go on the storage card. I
just
> downloaded & did initial checks & it looks good. I'm still fiddling with
it.
>
> Good luck on your systems & 73's.
>
> de
>
> Ralph NH6QT/3
>
>
>
>.
------------------------------
End of Ham-Digital Digest V2000 #80
******************************
You can send in your contribution to this digest by
sending an e-mail to: hd-group@pa2aga.ampr.org
or (via BBS-net) to: hdaga@pi8vnw.#zh2.nld.eu
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
