| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 22.03.00 20:25l 260 Lines 7567 Bytes #-9539 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_77B
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/77B
Path: DB0AAB<DB0KFB<DB0CZ<F6KFG<DB0PSC<DB0ACH<DB0WST<DB0ME<ON6AR<PI8HWB<
PI8VAD<PI8HGL<PE1NMB<EA7URC<PE0MAR<PI8VNW
Sent: 000322/1306Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:58666 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g24
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA31690 ; Wed, 22 Mar 00 11:10:06 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.70/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00018443 ; Sat, 18 Mar 2000 18:06:24 MET
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 00 17:49:37 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_77B>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 2000/77B
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
Subject: Packet on FRS?
Well lets start with on amateur packet or any ham freqs you can't discuss
anything business related. Nothing that can be business at all. So if I
send a message to my friend that I work with and we talk about what we are
going to do the next day or about a stupid customer that can't get logged on
because they are using their password for their user name then we just broke
the law. Chances of getting caught are slime to none but it is not legal.
Packet on FRS would be great. We use it to talk about things all day long
and it would be nice to be able to send messages that the casual listener
would not get. Are the scramblers legal?
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 12:07:56 -0500
From: "Matt Bryda" <mbryda@csc.com>
Subject: Packet on FRS?
Sparky <Sparkey402@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:38d11426@news.nwlink.com...
> Well lets start with on amateur packet or any ham freqs you can't discuss
> anything business related. Nothing that can be business at all. So if I
> send a message to my friend that I work with and we talk about what we are
> going to do the next day or about a stupid customer that can't get logged
on
> because they are using their password for their user name then we just
broke
> the law. Chances of getting caught are slime to none but it is not legal.
> Packet on FRS would be great. We use it to talk about things all day long
> and it would be nice to be able to send messages that the casual listener
> would not get. Are the scramblers legal?
I think you would be OK. You can't use the Ham frequencies to promote
your business. Ie: you can't talk about how good your company is. But, you
can talk about stupid users and such.
-Matt
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 14:48:00 GMT
From: Walter Gesundheit <w2dne@my-deja.com>
Subject: Packet on FRS?
In article <8aqlsl020s1@enews3.newsguy.com>,
"Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@texoma.net> wrote:
> You've probably heard me mention a time or two the Amateur Packet
Radio
> network in Europe being much more advanced and developed than
anything in
> the US?
>
> Well, the CB operators over there are better off too. They CAN and DO
use
> digital, and operate a CB BBS network similar to that used by Hams.
It's
> legal over there.
>
> --
>
> 73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
> N5PVL @ N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
> http://www.texoma.net/~n5pvl
Hey, guys and girls,
I know what let's do!
Let's pass the hat and buy dump huck Charles a big honkin' CB rig and a
train ticket to Europe and we'll be rid of his constant whining and
burping.
And that's the way it is!
Walter
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 19:18:56 GMT
From: RanHefner <ranhefner@my-deja.com>
Subject: Packet on FRS?
No, you can not conduct business on the amateur bands, but you can have
the conversation you mentioned below and it would NOT be against FCC
regs.
Yes, packet on FRS would be interesting, but it IS against FCC regs.
In article <38d11426@news.nwlink.com>,
"Sparky" <Sparkey402@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Well lets start with on amateur packet or any ham freqs you can't
discuss
> anything business related. Nothing that can be business at all. So if
I
> send a message to my friend that I work with and we talk about what
we are
> going to do the next day or about a stupid customer that can't get
logged on
> because they are using their password for their user name then we
just broke
> the law. Chances of getting caught are slime to none but it is not
legal.
> Packet on FRS would be great. We use it to talk about things all day
long
> and it would be nice to be able to send messages that the casual
listener
> would not get. Are the scramblers legal?
>
>
--
Randy A. Hefner
http://members.xoom.com/qx3fun
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/qx3
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 16:17:28 -0800
From: Kevin <xrivaznyl@ubgznvy.pbz>
Subject: TrueTTY: Handle RTTY and PSK31 via sound card
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 11:04:52 -0500 (EST)
From: amx@dxsoft.com (Sergei Podstrigailo)
To: MS-News@Simtel.Net
Cc: amx@dxsoft.com
Subject: trtty135.zip - TrueTTY: Handle RTTY and PSK31 via sound card
Keywords: simtel,win95
Summary: Reposted by David Kirschbaum
Message-Id: <20000301110452.kirschd@Simtel.Net>
I have uploaded to Simtel.Net:
http://www.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/win95/ham/trtty135.zip
ftp://ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/win95/ham/trtty135.zip 1070927 bytes
trtty135.zip TrueTTY: Handle RTTY and PSK31 via sound card
Program to receive and transmit RTTY (radioteletype) and PSK31 (BPSK
mode) via sound card. No additional hardware required - you need only a
transceiver and computer with sound card. Optionally you can use simple
circuit for PTT-control. It make fast and convenient frequence control
and has a lot macros for tramsmitting. Can cooperate with RZ4AG AAlog
logger.
Special requirements: 5x86-133, Pentium-75 or better, sound card.
Changes: FSK support was added, more macros were added, interface was
improved. Bug with fast speed RTTY was fixed.
trtty135.zip has replaced trtty130.zip.
Shareware. Uploaded by the author.
Sergei Podstrigailo
amx@dxsoft.com
http://www.dxsoft.com/
--
Kevin
http://nworegon.htmlplanet.com/ a site covering NW Oregon, Scanner SWL
and Ham Radio topics and links.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:46:43 -0700
From: Tate <73KC7ZRU73@cyberhighway.net>
Subject: Which TNC
I'll second the motion for Linux,
Just setup my first Linux box (Red Hat 6.0). Sure there's a bit of a learning
curve, but the potential is awesome and not just for packet. About anything
ham
is fair game. With the newer distributions, the curve isn't near what it was 2
years ago - when last I looked and bailed.
So far been getting APRS stuff setup (xastir, Xaprs) - next will be at least a
sat tracking package. There's a LOT more out there to be had. For chuckles
going to try DosAPRS under DOSEMU - we'll see.
If you're sitting on the fence trying to decide whether or not to dive in,
here
- lemme push you over. Water's great.
73
Laura Halliday wrote:
>
> Linux has kernel support for AX.25 with drivers for sound cards,
> Baycom, YAM, etc.
>
> Flexnet is useful. Baycom have all kinds of neat (and cheap)
> goodies. There are others - anybody?
>
> Buy an external box if you must, but doing it in software is
> cheaper and often works better.
> --
> Laura Halliday VA3LDH "Laisse le vent tout emporter..."
> Grid: FN03gs - Foly/Viennet
--
KC7ZRU | In Laramie Area
Laramie, WY | UARC Repeater
DN71eh | 146.610
"The Dungeon" online at http://www.cyberhighway.net/~tateb
Remove 73s from addy to send email
>.
------------------------------
End of Ham-Digital Digest V2000 #77
******************************
You can send in your contribution to this digest by
sending an e-mail to: hd-group@pa2aga.ampr.org
or (via BBS-net) to: hdaga@pi8vnw.#zh2.nld.eu
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
