| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 17.03.00 19:26l 228 Lines 7031 Bytes #-9544 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_74A
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/74A
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<DB0MRW<OK0PKL<OK0PPR<OK0PPL<OK0POK<9A0YRB<9A0BBS<9A0YDA<
HA1KZH<HA5OB<HA3PG<SV1AAW<EA7URC<PE0MAR<PI8VNW
Sent: 000317/1437Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:57693 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g24
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA31516 ; Thu, 16 Mar 00 17:50:25 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.70/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00018393 ; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 18:11:10 MET
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 00 18:07:27 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_74A>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 2000/74A
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
Ham-Digital Digest Tue, 14 Mar 2000 Volume 2000 : Issue 74
Today's Topics:
Analog Amateur Radio Licensees Needed!
Digital Amateur Radio License (2 msgs)
fs: kpc9612
KAM + Timeout
May QEX digital voice article (14 msgs)
Newbie attempts sono-net?
Packet Cluster on the linux os
Pk-232 and Hamcom?
PKGold dos version in win98
Question about mounting VHF/UHF omni next to TV antenna
Soundmodem and Alinco DJ-190T
tnc software
Which TNC (2 msgs)
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Ham-Digital@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Ham-Digital-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the Ham-Digital Digest are available
(by FTP only) from ftp.UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/ham-digital".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
Loop-Detect: Ham-Digital:2000/74
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:16:41 GMT
From: n0zo@lcia.com (Pat McKeeby)
Subject: Analog Amateur Radio Licensees Needed!
Hey Brabham - you sure it was a typo?
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 14:01:01 -0600, "Charles Brabham"
<n5pvl@texoma.net> wrote:
>
>Gary Coffman <ke4zv@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>news:2F=KOLC2wVRzz17+nNvO2pkpPyut@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 06:10:20 GMT, "Dan Finn" <finnd@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >Raleigh to the coast in Wilmington) as well as 3107 and 3121 on 75
>meters.
>>
>> Ah, I believe those are marine band frequencies, not 75m frequencies.
>> Must be those pesky out of band mods again.
>>
>> Gary
>> Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it |mail to ke4zv@bellsouth.net
>> 534 Shannon Way | We break it |
>> Lawrenceville, GA | Guaranteed |
>
>Notice who attempts to denigrate a post (over a typo) that spoke about
>Amateur Radio in a positive fashion? One of the Amateur tcpip crew.
>
>Standard, typical behavior.
>
>--
>
>73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
>N5PVL @ N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
>http://www.texoma.net/~n5pvl
>
>
>
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 07:22:54 -0600
From: "Steve Sampson" <ssampson@usa-site.net>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
"Hank Oredson" wrote
> Want a URL so you can find them?
> Aw heck, here is a clue, free of charge: http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/
> All the RFCs, STDs, et al available to read.
> Which one tells about guaranteed delivery?
I can't find the BBS one? Which RFC covers the Ham Radio BBS
mail system? Shows that it is guaranteed delivery?
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 07:30:27 -0600
From: "Steve Sampson" <ssampson@usa-site.net>
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
"Rob Janssen" wrote
> >> There are NO "guarantees" Steve, none at all, in either network.
> >> It is all "best effort".
>
> >I didn't say there was grandpa, I mentioned that packet BBS has no
> >mail receipt, and that SMTP mail does.
>
> But you are wrong. Many BBS systems provide for a mail receipt, and none
> is required in the SMTP standard.
Semantics.
None is required of the BBS system, but many SMTP *systems* provide for a
mail receipt.
> Voluntary standards to support it do exist, like in the BBS system.
Semantics. propping up the BBS paradigm again... Should I break out my
XMODEM protocol?
> And different systems do it in a different
> way, so you sometimes get receipts about mail not yet delivered to the user
> or even not yet delivered to its final destination. It may be lost after
> you got your receipt.
The /var/spool/mail directory may be full, may crash etc. Your not telling me
anything new.
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 14:51:20 GMT
From: "James Mellon" <ka3idn@earthlink.net>
Subject: fs: kpc9612
I have a kpc 9612 for sale works good , just not intrested any more.
$100
jim
ka3idn@earthlink.net
>.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 10:59:49 -0600
From: "Lionel" <lbooth@ametro.net>
Subject: KAM + Timeout
On RTTY the KAM+ times out and goes back to rx. I have moved the jumper to
the longer timeout position, which I think is supposed to be 10 minutes. It
still drops out 2-4 minutes into a qso. Anyone else ever have this issue?
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 12:01:05 GMT
From: kelly@dvol.com (Brian Kelly)
Subject: May QEX digital voice article
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 04:19:55 -0600, Brian <burke1@icss.net> wrote:
>> I'm very determined to beep dx and I work my butt off in the process.
>> I have every intention of giving PSK31 a spin as soon as I can break a
>> computer loose for the shack but it's not "one of my life objectives".
>
>Brian, so you reject the notion that someone elses favorite mode should be
shoved down
>your throat?
>
Of course. This whole thread is about the "glories" of digital voice
radio, I'm at best only mildly interested in the whole topic in both
it's voice and teleprinting varieties. I'm getting leaned on for not
being "excitd" about any of it, it ain't my thing and never will be my
thing. I beep dx for the most part so forget "shoving the stuff down
my throat" and I ain't making any bones about it. I'll try some
digital radio. When I see some of these upcoming 5wpm digigeek
Generals beep anybody I'll have more respect for what they actually
know about HF ham radio.
>
w3rv
>.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 04:19:55 -0600
From: Brian <burke1@icss.net>
Subject: May QEX digital voice article
Brian Kelly wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2000 18:37:42 GMT, z005381b@bc.seflin.org (James Rosenthal)
> wrote:
>
> >Steve Sampson (ssampson@usa-site.net) wrote:
> >: "Brian Kelly" wrote
> >
> >: > thankew. I gotta live long enough to see the collection of NCTA HF
> >: > digital comms proponents in this NG get off their dead butts and make
> >: > any new digital thingey actually happen anywhere on any ham band.
> >
> >Does PSK count?
> >
> >You can do it too. Just takes getting off YOUR lazy butt and putting
> >forth some "effort" and "serious determination".
> >
> I'm very determined to beep dx and I work my butt off in the process.
> I have every intention of giving PSK31 a spin as soon as I can break a
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_74B
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
