| |
PA2AGA > HDDIG 16.03.00 15:10l 222 Lines 7588 Bytes #-9546 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_2000_72A
Read: GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 2000/72A
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0GPP<DB0LX<DB0RBS<DB0PSC<DB0ACH<PI8JOP<PI8ZAA<PI8HWB<
PI8HGL<PE1MVX<PE1NMB<EA7URC<PE0MAR<PI8VNW
Sent: 000314/0505Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:55982 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g24
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To : HDDIG@EU
Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
id AA31381 ; Tue, 14 Mar 00 04:38:39 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.70/7.5.3) with SMTP
id AA00018336 ; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 19:27:58 MET
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 00 19:25:59 MET
Message-Id: <hd_2000_72A>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 2000/72A
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B
Ham-Digital Digest Sun, 12 Mar 2000 Volume 2000 : Issue 72
Today's Topics:
Analog Amateur Radio Licensees Needed! (3 msgs)
AX.25 Specs
Digital Amateur Radio License (4 msgs)
dosAPRS and BayPac (2 msgs)
hammcom
May QEX digital voice article (19 msgs)
Need info on encoder board
NEW ALL RADIO AUCTION SITE: ELECTRON BAY
Speeding up TS-440 TX -> RX switch time ??????
Spock sings about the HF "bitter dregs"!
THENET FILES,I need help!
WTB - Interface
WTB: Packet, Amtor, Pactor pgm for Kam+
WTB KAM+ or KAM-98
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Ham-Digital@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Ham-Digital-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the Ham-Digital Digest are available
(by FTP only) from ftp.UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/ham-digital".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
Loop-Detect: Ham-Digital:2000/72
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 10:03:36 -0500
From: Gary Coffman <ke4zv@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Analog Amateur Radio Licensees Needed!
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 06:10:20 GMT, "Dan Finn" <finnd@earthlink.net> wrote:
>Raleigh to the coast in Wilmington) as well as 3107 and 3121 on 75 meters.
Ah, I believe those are marine band frequencies, not 75m frequencies.
Must be those pesky out of band mods again.
Gary
Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it |mail to ke4zv@bellsouth.net
534 Shannon Way | We break it |
Lawrenceville, GA | Guaranteed |
>.
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 14:01:01 -0600
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@texoma.net>
Subject: Analog Amateur Radio Licensees Needed!
Gary Coffman <ke4zv@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:2F=KOLC2wVRzz17+nNvO2pkpPyut@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 06:10:20 GMT, "Dan Finn" <finnd@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >Raleigh to the coast in Wilmington) as well as 3107 and 3121 on 75
meters.
>
> Ah, I believe those are marine band frequencies, not 75m frequencies.
> Must be those pesky out of band mods again.
>
> Gary
> Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it |mail to ke4zv@bellsouth.net
> 534 Shannon Way | We break it |
> Lawrenceville, GA | Guaranteed |
Notice who attempts to denigrate a post (over a typo) that spoke about
Amateur Radio in a positive fashion? One of the Amateur tcpip crew.
Standard, typical behavior.
--
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
N5PVL @ N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
http://www.texoma.net/~n5pvl
>.
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 13:53:54 -0600
From: "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@texoma.net>
Subject: Analog Amateur Radio Licensees Needed!
Dan, you were listening to the standard "party line" that can be expected of
a typical "LandLine Lid". These people require such negativity, true or not,
at any expense. There's no telling why they are sick this way, but a fact's
a fact.
These people feel they must pre-suppose that all Hams are as clueless and
worthless as they are. Self-sacrifice and the innate nobility to be found in
most Hams who participate in emergency communications such as you speak of,
are totally foreign to these "LandLine Lids". They cannot find that decency
in themselves and so assume that nobody else can, either.
This newsgroup is infested by a number of persons who have obtained a Ham
license but have little or no knowledge, feeling, or pride concerning
Amateur Radio and their fellow Hams. Notice how the very worst of them
profess an interest in Amateur tcpip? Tells you a lot about Amateur tcpip,
doesn't it, Dan?
--
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
N5PVL @ N5PVL.#NTX.TX.USA.NOAM
http://www.texoma.net/~n5pvl
Dan Finn <finnd@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:grly4.7681$u8.294714@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
>
> > brian@karoshi.ucsd.edu (Brian Kantor) wrote:
> > >
> > > Ham radio is essentially irrelevent to modern emergency and disaster
> > > communications, as you very well know. We hams have little or nothing
> > > to offer anymore; our services have been eclipsed by modern technology
> > > in the hands of professionals.
> >(cut)
>
> I cannot believe I'm reading this. Virtually every time there is a major
> hurricane in
> North Carolina (once/twice per year), every other mode of communcations is
> down.
> During Fran, we even had Gov. Hunt checking the damage from the EOC in
> Raleigh,
> and, the National Guard and police used the 2 meter band (on repeaters
> linked from
> Raleigh to the coast in Wilmington) as well as 3107 and 3121 on 75 meters.
> In addition, the National weather service gets real time reports by
> communicating
> with hams on 2m repeaters using the Skywarn system, which even the TV
> forecasters
> listen to, and people with scanners listen to, to find out what is really
> happening outside.
> This is the best WX information available. Most active local hams
> participate. Where do you guys get this stuff about irrelevance? Ham radio
> turns out
> to be about the only RELIABLE form of communications available here during
> disasters,
> long after cellular phones and the internet are down. From experience, I
am
> absolutely
> convinced, as are our non-ham community leaders and the Red Cross, that
ham
> radio
> is an essential component of modern emergency and disaster communications
in
> North
> Carolina. We have emergency power (generators and deep discharge
batteries)
> and can get
> very creative to keep communications going when needed. I must
characterize
> your
> statements above as being very naive with respect to actual real world
> emergency situations.
>
> 73,
>
> de KR4AJ (Dan)
>
>
>.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 10:35:12 GMT
From: nomail@rob.knoware.nl (Rob Janssen)
Subject: AX.25 Specs
Andreas Aigner <aigner.andreas@aon.at> wrote:
>Hello everybody !
>Where (in the Web) can I find AX.25 Specs and detailed technical Infos about
>Packet Radio?
I believe they could be found on www.tapr.org
Rob
--
+----------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
| Rob Janssen pe1chl@amsat.org | WWW: http://www.knoware.nl/users/rob |
| AMPRnet: rob@pe1chl.ampr.org | AX.25 BBS: PE1CHL@PI8WNO.#UTR.NLD.EU |
+----------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
>.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 09:29:51 GMT
From: nomail@rob.knoware.nl (Rob Janssen)
Subject: Digital Amateur Radio License
Steve Sampson <ssampson@usa-site.net> wrote:
>There is no guarantee that an email message sent via packet is ever received.
>Thus, most use the internet, where the message is guaranteed to be delivered,
>and if selected will even tell you the time and date your message was read.
To be continued in digest: hd_2000_72B
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
