OpenBCM V1.13 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
PA2AGA > HDDIG    09.11.99 00:44l 192 Lines 6033 Bytes #-9691 (0) @ EU
BID : HD_99_284B
Read: DL6KCF GUEST
Subj: HamDigitalDigest 99/284B
Path: DB0AAB<DB0SL<DB0FSG<IN3TRX<IN3TTI<IW3FPP<IW4BYK<I6DQE<IK6RUY<IK4ICZ<
      I4UKI<IW4BVX<IW3EFI<IW9EXL<SV1AAW<SV1AAW<EA7URC<PE0MAR<PI8VNW
Sent: 991108/1915Z @:PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU #:14304 [HvHolland] FBB7.00g $:HD_99_28
From: PA2AGA@PI8VNW.#ZH2.NLD.EU
To  : HDDIG@EU

Received: from pa2aga by pi1hvh with SMTP
        id AA22831 ; Mon, 08 Nov 99 18:43:37 UTC
Received: from pa2aga by pa2aga (NET/Mac 2.3.67/7.5.3) with SMTP
        id AA00016758 ; Mon, 08 Nov 99 19:16:16 MET
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 99 19:11:51 MET
Message-Id: <hd_99_284B>
From: pa2aga
To: hd_broadcast@pa2aga
Subject: HamDigitalDigest 99/284B
X-BBS-Msg-Type: B

>.

------------------------------

Date: 6 Nov 1999 05:48:15 GMT
From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@rising.com.au>
Subject: Help with RFC

In rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc Steve Sampson <ssampson@usa-site.net> wrote:
> The concept of networking was quite different back then.

> Today Hams need a class A like they need a hole in the head :-)

Spectrum, IP addresses, is there anything else of ours
you want to give away Steve?


Hamish, surprised.
-- 
Hamish Moffatt       Mobile: +61 412 011 176     hamish@rising.com.au
Rising Software Australia Pty. Ltd.    http://www.risingsoftware.com/
Phone: +61 3 9894 4788    Fax: +61 3 9894 3362    USA: 1 888 667 7839
>.

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 03:29:46 GMT
From: Dale Gillilan <positivechanges.hypnosis@gte.net>
Subject: HF email

I'm wanting to send/receive HF email.  I have an HP 200LX palmtop (DOS
based).  Any suggestions what hardware/software to use?  Or, must I go
to windows?

Dale

>.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:05:40 +0100
From: "Olgierd Wołodkiewicz" <ogi@zeus.polsl.gliwice.pl>
Subject: radio link for RS-232

Where can I find a schematic and circuits to construct radio null modem
between two computers.

- distance 200 meters
- speed 115kbps (I don't need faster)

Olgierd Wolodkiewicz
ogi@zeus.polsl.gliwice.pl



>.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 16:20:49 -0500
From: Evhen Tupis <evman@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: WinCE to KPC3 help, please

WOW.  Great Site!  Thanks for the tip!
-= Ev =-


Neal wrote:
> 
> Try http://www.qsl.net/kc7gnm/packet_hpc.html
>.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 00:18:36 +0000
From: Roger Barker <roger@peaksys.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Winpack 6.42 - local BBS ignores F> for download

In article <38235ede.16879263@news.compuserve.com>, Richard C. Ferryman
<106255.1565@compuserve.com> writes
>I have just used Winpack after some time.  My previous BBS has closed
>and the new one is running FBB 7.0.  Winpack downloads the message
>list and marks the required bulls and mail but when it goes to
>retrieve it sends  first [WINPACK-6.4-$] to which the BBS replies with
>an error message then Winpack sends F< and the local BBS just sits and
>does nothing until the link times out.

With FBB V7 the sysop must give you 'F' status on the BBS. One big
problem with BBSs changing to V7 from, say 5.15, is that many sysops
aren't exactly too well clued up on the technical implications of what
they are doing, and it is made worse by the lack of any documentation
regarding exactly how V7 behaves differently to previous versions. So
they stick V7 on their BBSs and then have no idea what to do when their
users suddenly start having problems.

Here's the WinPack FBB V7 FAQ:-

**********************************************************************

Problem:  My local BBS has now changed over the FBB V7 and WinPack is
          giving problems.

          (The problems may be that compressed download and forwarding
          cannot be used, or that the BBS disconnects you when you try
          to upload mail after you have downloaded some messages, or
          that WinPack sticks at WAITPROMPT, or that automatic bulletin
          selection no longer works.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Answer:   There are some significant differences in the way that FBB V7
          behaves compared to V5.15.

          1. Users need to have the 'F' flag set in their status, or
          they usually can't use compressed download and compressed
          forward at all. You need to consult your sysop about getting
          the 'F' flag set.

          2. FBB V7 will NOT allow a user to use both compressed
          download and compressed forward in the same session. Therefore
          WinPack users should either not use compressed forwarding, or
          they should edit PACKET.INI and put "SPLIT_SESSIONS=TRUE" in
          the [FBB] section. This stops WinPack trying to use both
          compressed forward and compressed download in the same
          session. Please note that from V6.3 onwards "Split Sessions"
          can be set from the "Mail", "Mail Options" window in WinPack,
          you don't need to edit PACKET.INI.

          3. When a BBS changes over to FBB V7, the BBS prompt may
          change, so you may need to change "BBS prompt" in "Personal/
          BBS Info". If you find the BBS sends you a multi-line prompt,
          the best thing to do is to manually connect to the BBS and
          send the 'X' command to put yourself in expert mode. WinPack
          does not handle the multi-line prompt very well.

          4. When a BBS changes over to FBB V7, the layout of the
          message list may change. If you don't use the unproto headers,
          you may need to work through the various options on the
          WinPack "Options", "Bulletin Columns..." sub-menu.


Roger Barker, G4IDE
February 1998

**********************************************************************

-- 
Roger Barker, G4IDE  roger@peaksys.demon.co.uk
Boston, UK           http://www.peaksys.demon.co.uk
>.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 21:20:13 -0600
From: W6RCecilA <Cecil.A.Moore@IEEE.org>
Subject: WTD PTC-II Pactor Controller

Brian Short wrote:
> I am looking to acquire an SCS PTC-II Pactor Controller.

How popular is PACTOR II?
-- 
73, Cecil, W6RCA   http://www.bigfoot.com/~w6rca
>.

------------------------------

End of Ham-Digital Digest V99 #284
******************************


To be continued in digest: hd_99_284C







Read previous mail | Read next mail


 22.05.2026 14:49:10lGo back Go up