| |
I0OJJ > FBB 17.01.18 21:37l 42 Lines 1473 Bytes #-3111 (0) @ WW
BID : 6EC43_I0OJJ
Read: DK3UZ GUEST
Subj: Re: n1uro
Path: DB0FHN<OE2XZR<OE5XBR<OE1XAB<HG8LXL<CX2SA<IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<IK6ZDE<I0OJJ
Sent: 180117/1854z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] #:6951 $:6ec43_I0OJJ
> Date: 17 Jan 18 15:30:00 GMT
> From: n1uro@n1uro.#cct.ct.usa.noam
> To: fbb@ww
> Subject: Re: I0OJJ
>
> R:180117/1533Z 35907@N9PMO.#SEWI.WI.USA.NA BPQ6.0.14
> R:180117/1533Z 2507@GB7YEW.GB7YEW.#79.GBR.EURO BPQ6.0.14
> R:180117/1532Z @:PI8CDR.#DRE.NLD.EURO #:17630 [Westerbork] $:58554_N1URO
> R:180117/1531Z @:VE2PKT.#QBC.QC.CAN.NOAM #:55209 $:58554_N1URO
> R:180117/1530Z @:N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM #:58554 [Unionville] $:58554_N1URO
>
> From: N1URO@N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM
> To : FBB@WW
>
> Gus;
> You failed to see the difference in scripts.
> While I never said the old one did not work - it does - the WAY it sends
> mail is not what Bernard had intended I don't believe since he makes a
> shell variable called SYSOP but never calls it. It appears SP SYSOP meant
> to be SP $SYSOP which is a big difference.
>
> SP SYSOP you get a copy of mail for sysop and sp sysop mail remains even when
> you kill your own copy. The way I rewrote it putting in what looked like the
> variable Bernard intended to use, there are NO stragling orphaned emails to
> "sysop" remaining.
>
> Try it then comment back.
Brian,
yes I know the difference... I prefer (in the past) to report
to 'sysop' or to not report at all, but changing the SP to 'i0ojj'
that msgs will bi addressed to i0ojj as the norma SP mail...
so, the problem is academic only :) or it doesn't exits
--
73 and ciao, gus i0ojj/ir0aab
A proud member of linux team
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
