| |
I0OJJ > DPBOX 01.04.24 15:33l 59 Lines 2037 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : S1R4F_I0OJJ
Read: DJ6UX GUEST
Subj: Re: DPBOX & others
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RKB<DK0WUE<PD0LPM<VE3CGR<VE6NAS<VE2PKT<VK4OT<LU4ECL<IW8PGT<
IZ3LSV<I0OJJ
Sent: 240401/1227z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] DP6.00 $:S1R4F_I0OJJ
From: I0OJJ @ I0OJJ.ITA.EU (Gustavo)
To: DPBOX @ WW
X-Info: Upload without password authentication
>*** Bulletin-ID: 25435_UT1HZM ***
>R:240401/0856Z 25435@UT1HZM.KREM.POL.UKR.EU BPQ6.0.24
>Hi all
>>I0OJJ:
>> About this statement: the famigerate BPQ PMS was
>> copied from an alpha state windoze WinFBB and so
>> remained stupid and buggy enough specially on forward
>> side, with other PBBS system... this matter already
>> documented in past messages and reiterated by a recent
>> msg to the .io group. But NEVER considered by the author.
>Its not all true, Gus.
Ah ah, look at english language text used by WFBB ante year 2000.
That file is NOT the *original* one edited for (x)FBB by LA6CU
and amended/restyled by I0OJJ which you can find inside the recent
LinFBB releases.
>BPQ bbs was never a reply of FBB sources and it working almost fine.
>And more - its MOST popular packet BBS s/w now!
>Just GUI interface of Win BPQ bbs done in FBB-style - as it is famous
>by most of sysops.
Eh eh...
>The only problem could be telnet fwd session to some other bbs s/w
>as you reported before.
>But how much cases of "pure telnet'ers" and why not use netrom L3
>protocol to do store and forward well, instead of just telnet?!
The telnet feature as been and is today the best resource introduced
by F6FBB since the phisical packet nodes went dismantled and PBBS
number reduced to historycal minimum after 2000.
I own today several forwarding totally implemented on telnet since
for diverse reasons some partners have no or limited netrom/INP/FlexNet
or other resources.
By the way, the method adopted on BPQ and regarding the two different
telnet approach (see TCPPORT and FBBPORT) are a true disaster!
Why not simply use the (one) telnet feature of other STANDARD PBBS?
I'am aware that now there is an inflacting number of nodes and so
it is the time, for me, to re-use the DPBOX which is a standard
forwarder using ONLY TNCs and NODES... :)
>73, Sergej.
--
73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj/ir0aab/ir0eq
non multa, sed multum
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
