| |
VE2EQ > CLOVER 03.01.98 00:16l 38 Lines 1057 Bytes #-9632 (0) @ WW
BID : 26330_W6NWG
Read: GUEST
Subj: CLOVER-2000 ham activity ?
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0LX<DB0RBS<DB0SWR<DB0FP<DB0SON<DB0ERF<DB0HSK<PI8DRS<
PI8DAZ<PI8GCB<PI8WNO<PI8VAD<PI8VNW<PE0MAR<XE2EBC<WB0TAX<N7NEI<KA6EYH<
W6VIO<K6VE<N7SX<KC6CEM<W6JBT<WB6DGR<W6NWG
Sent: 971228/2233z @:W6NWG.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM #:26330
Hi,
I am curious to know if there is any CLOVER-2000 ham activity
in Europe or elsewhere ? We cannot use this mode on HF as we
are limited to 1 kHz bandwidth.
I do use CLOVER-2000 on experimental frequencies... but I am
curious to know if BBS systems have adopted this high-speed
waveform for HF traffic forwarding ?
Our tests have shown that the CLOVER-2000 waveform is robust
and efficient... it seems that it would be a "natural" for
HF data forwarding... if the FCC (US) and IC (Industry Canada)
both accept a rule change.
In Africa and South America, there are already many HF commercial
traffic networks being implemented using this high-speed
waveform (maximum 3000bps throughput).
PACTOR-II *is very powerful* (I have experimented with 2x SCS
units)... but I am not aware of any higher-speed versions
from them.
If we could use CLOVER-2000, it would speed-up long-haul traffic
handling (not as fast as via the Internet... but that's different).
Any comments ?
RSVP
73 from Bruno, VE2EQ/W6
San Marcos, California, USA
ITU grid: DM13kd
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
