| |
I0OJJ > BPQ 08.02.20 02:45l 56 Lines 2007 Bytes #-2426 (0) @ WW
BID : FE5D5_I0OJJ
Read: DJ6UX DF7EAV GUEST
Subj: Re: F>
Path: DB0FHN<OE2XZR<OE5XBR<OE1XAB<HG8LXL<CX2SA<F4DUR<LU4ECL<GB7CIP<GB7YEW<
KE0GB<VE3CGR<I0OJJ
Sent: 200208/0024z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] #:98852 $:fe5d5_I0OJJ
>From i0ojj@i0ojj.ampr.org Sat Feb 8 01:24:16 2020
Received: from [44.134.32.240] by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0m.1) with SMTP
id AA98852 ; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 01:24:16 +0100
References: <14752PY2BIL@ir1uaw.bbs>
>From: Gustavo Ponza <i0ojj@i0ojj.ampr.org>
Organization: SICD Rome
Message-ID: <46caedd7-25bc-4d56-90ae-6213f0efe5d5@i0ojj.ampr.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <14752PY2BIL@ir1uaw.bbs>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> PY2BIL > BPQ 08.02.20 00:50l 113 Lines 3770 Bytes #1 (0) @ WW
> BID : 14752PY2BIL
> X-Flags: Type B Hold ! Prop ! Rep ! Cont ! Erase !
> Subj: F>
> R:200207/2350z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU $:14752PY2BIL
> R:200207/2347Z @:GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO #:44161 [Caterham Surrey GBR]
> R:200207/2346Z 15189@GB7YEW.#79.GBR.EURO LinBPQ6.0.18
> R:200207/2346Z 9245@VA7RBP.#SCBC.BC.CAN.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.19
> R:200207/2346Z 46511@NS2B.#WNY.NY.USA.NOAM BPQ6.0.19
> R:200207/2344Z 35856@N9PMO.#SEWI.WI.USA.NOAM BPQ6.0.19
> R:200207/2344Z 12517@VE1MPF.#MCTN.NB.CAN.NOAM BPQ6.0.19
>
> Re: Anomailes in 6.0.19.1
> R:200207/2344Z 23694@PY2BIL.SP.BRA.SOAM LinBPQ6.0.19
>
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> Red,
>
> I have not seen that behaviour. I'm running beta versions of BPQ and the latest
> from today 6.0.19.30 does not present that, et leas to me.
>
> I have also a msg fwd with OK2PEN (hosted in Brazil, btw) set up here, but he
> runs a FBB instance. Maybe that is what it is, but again, I haven't seen it
> here.
>
> The best way to get in touch with John with these issues is his goups.io mailing
> list. He's *very* active over there.
>
> 73
Yes, but the 'F>' on the 'Subject' line reappeared again :)
So the good big jobs by G8BPQ remain vanished if lazy or
unskilled sysops continue to run old buggy BPQ software :(
--
73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj/ir0aab/ir0eq
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
