| |
W0RLI > BPQ 16.02.00 07:42l 41 Lines 919 Bytes #-9736 (0) @ WW
BID : 17DA9W0RLI
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Solution to BPQ32
Path: DB0AAB<DB0SL<DB0RGB<DB0MAK<OK0PKL<OK0PPR<OK0PPL<OK0POK<9A0YRB<PP5BLU<
WB0TAX<N5VDA<WB7AWL<WB7VMS<N7DXT<W0RLI
Sent: 000215/0627 4607@W0RLI.OR.USA.NOAM
<df3vi@db0gos.#nrw.deu.eu> wrote in message news:e20db0gos05g...
> W0RLI wrote:
> >So flexnet is pretty much useless with KISS TNCs.
>
> No, the KISS-mode on radio interfaces is pretty much useless.
Evidence for this statement?
> I has so poor timing that you should not use it, and that is
> why flexnet does not support KISS-TNCs.
Funny, the KISS I know about has CRC and can supply packet sent
timing accurate to about 2 milliseconds. I wonder why the FlexNet
bigots seem to know so little about KISS?
> >Sounds like a terrible bug in flexnet!
> Its not a bug, its done by purpose, as flexnet should not
> be linked with KISS-TNCs on radio.
Why, other than bugs in FlexNet?
> You may use KISS on internal links, there it is ok.
> Better you use a CRC-KISS-software, of course.
> That could prevent a lot of garbage which is produced on S&F.
Nonesense.
--
... Hank
http://horedson.home.att.net
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
