| |
SM7UZI > BPQ 11.02.00 19:19l 32 Lines 1478 Bytes #-9741 (0) @ WW
BID : SM7UZI248
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Solution to BPQ32
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0ABH<DB0SRS<DB0ROF<DB0ERF<DB0ABZ<DB0CEL<DB0FC<DF0HMB<
DB0MAR<DB0HRO<OZ4BOX<OZ7PAC<OZ3PAC<OZ6BBS<OZ3BOC<SK7IQ
Sent: 000211/1509Z @:SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU #:17821 [Malmö] $:SM7UZI248 FBB7.00g
From: SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
To : BPQ@WW
>> If you have a non tnc2 compatible tnc are you stuck with kiss, but most
>> people don't care, they are not aware of te problems with kiss.
>
>And if they are then stuck with KISS mode for their TNC's, why not use it
>with Flexnet? Does BPQ work better with KISS than Flexnet?
Donït think so, but it depends on alot of things, at 1k2 can some use it if
they are lucky.
Not every one can use flexnet with kiss, since you can't set txd, mode etc,
flexnets adaptive parameters does bot work as supposed to and, kiss can't be
used if you want to run a node, and smack isn't supported(only rmnc crc32 kiss,
for serial kiss links).
But for those who can't use flexnet is tfpcx or using the tnc in host mode a
better alternative than bpq I guess.
.a&$a. .a&$a. .a&$$$$$$$$$$&a. .a&$a. Anders Lageras
$$$$$$ $$$$$$ $$$$$$$' `$$$$$$ $$$$$$ Lund Sweden JO65PQ
$' `$$ $$$$$$ `ì$$$$$s,s$$$$$ì $$$$$$ AARS Member No. 81
$s,s$$ $$$$$$ a$$$$$$ì $$' `$ Packet:
73 de SM7-$$$$$$ $$$$$$ a$$$$$$ì $$s,s$ SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
$$$$$$ $$' `$ a$$$$$$ì $$$$$$ E-mail: sm7uzi@qsl.net
$$$$$$a$$s,s$ a$$$' `$$$$$$&a. $$$$$$ ICQ#: 5161379
$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$s,s$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$ Homepage:
`ì&$$$$$$$$ì' `ì&$$$$$$$$$$$ì' `ì&$ì' http://zap.to/sm7uzi/
NBF 1.79, Windows 32-bit
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
