| |
W0RLI > BPQ 10.08.99 07:50l 22 Lines 541 Bytes #-9929 (0) @ WW
BID : B750W0RLI
Read: DH9MAG DB1RAS GUEST
Subj: Re: BPQ vs FLEXNET
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0ABH<DB0SRS<DB0AIS<DB0NDK<DB0ACH<DB0PKE<DB0QS<DB0IZ<
ON6AR<WB0TAX<N7OO<WB7AWL<WB7VMS<KC7TLY<N7DXT<KC7KFE<K7IQI<W0RLI
Sent: 990810/0221 46929@W0RLI.OR.USA.NOAM
<sm7uzi@sk7iq.malmoe.m.swe.eu> wrote in message news:sm7uzi6346...
> Flexnet under win95 is not to be used for nodes.
BPQ and NOS nodes work quite well in Win95/98.
Guess this is yet ANOTHER failure of Flexnet.
Maybe someday it will be interesting software, but the authors
have MUCH work to do before that happens!
Have they published the backend and frontend API spec yet?
If so, did they implement the same API as BPQ, so that
existing applications continue to work? If not, why?
Inquiring minds want to know these things ...
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
