| |
F6IQA > BPQ 08.08.99 13:45l 27 Lines 925 Bytes #-9931 (0) @ WW
BID : 2C0336F6IQA
Read: DB1RAS GUEST
Subj: Re: BPQ vs FLEXNET
Path: DB0AAB<DB0KFB<HB9OS<HB9H<HB9OK<IW2FPO<IW5BFZ<IK1MVX<TK5KP<F6KED<
F5KPO<F5KAT
Sent: 990807/0730Z @:F5KAT.FMLR.FRA.EU #:50165 [Castelnau le lez] FBB7.00f
From: F6IQA@F5KAT.FMLR.FRA.EU
To : BPQ@WW
> SM7UZI doesn't seem to understand about Nodes and Digipeaters. BPQ nor
> Flexnet with a digipeater are not made for users so What's the use with
And what when it is not so? My house is on top of a hill and my BPQ driver
allows me to run my station for personal use and the switch is available
for hams all around. I do not think this is a very particular situation.
When choosing a location where to build their home, I do not know much
hams choosing a deep valley hi hi!
> Win 95 ? They operate usually on remote sites and the smallest the
> environment is the more practical it becomes. What's the use for Win 95
> with nobody to watch the screen. Both systems can operate from a
> disquette, for a Node in BPQ or a digip
73 - Joce, F6IQA @ F5KAT-1
f6iqa@amsat.org
f6iqa@bouygtel.com
icq: 23970387
Message timed: 19:55 on 06 Aug 99
Message sent using WinPack V6.4
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
