| |
M0AGT > BPQ 06.08.99 22:38l 20 Lines 409 Bytes #-9933 (0) @ WW
BID : 1C0140M0AGT
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: SM7UZI BPQ Comments
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0ABH<DB0BOX<DB0MAK<OK0PKL<OK0PPR<OK0PPL<OK0POK<OK0PAB<
HA5OB<WU3V<VK3BBS<VK7AX<WB0TAX<N7OO<7M3TJZ<GB7PLY<GB7NOT<GB7RUG<GB7COV<
GB7WAR<GB7AVM<GB7CIP<GB7SXE<GB7VRB<GB7IPW<GB7SUN<GB7BNM<GB7YEO<GB7TJF
Sent: 990803/1823Z @:GB7TJF.#45.GBR.EU #:34430 [Taunton] FBB7.00f $:1C0140M0AGT
From: M0AGT@GB7TJF.#45.GBR.EU
To : BPQ@WWW
M1CZF wrote:-
> I must agree in saying that Flexnet is quicker to set up, but you
> certainly don't get the flexibility of BPQ (eg. running BBSs and
> PMSs etc etc).
How come? FlexNet works with most of the forerunning packet software
and outperforms BPQ hands down.
73 - Rob, M0AGT @GB7TJF.#45.GBR.EU
Sent Using: PC/FlexNet 3.3g <> WinPack 6.42 <> Win95
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
