| |
SM3LKS > BPQ 29.01.99 05:23l 35 Lines 847 Bytes #-10127 (0) @ WW
BID : 29272_SM3LKS
Read: DH6BB SP6VXT DB1RAS GUEST
Subj: Re: HTM:Re: bpq vs flexnet
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<OE2XOM<OE5XBL<DB0RGB<DB0ABH<DB0BOX<DB0MAK<OK0PKL<OK0PPR<
SP6KBL<SP6PCM<SR6DJG<SR3BWX<SR9DIP<SR9ZAA<KA3FMO<7M3TJZ<OZ8PAC<OZ4PAC<
OZ4BBS<OZ3BOS<OZ3PAC<OZ6BBS<SK7CY<SK6FV<SK6YW<SK6BA<SK6LK<SM6MVP<
SM6HOC<SM7FEJ<SK7HR<SK7GC<SK5AS<SK5BN<SK5UM<SK5AE<SK5BB<SK4HC<SM4UMY<
SK4KS<SK4WV<SM4TYA<SM3ESS<SK3BG<SK3UB<SK3JR<SM3LKS
Sent: 990120/0012Z @:SM3LKS.Z.SWE.EU #:29272 [Ostersund] FBB7.00g $:29272_SM3LK
From: SM3LKS@SM3LKS.Z.SWE.EU
To : BPQ@WW
VK5KMG wrote:
><HTML>
><HEAD><TITLE>VK5KMG Packet Mail</TITLE></HEAD>
>
><!--------Edited bt G4YUU---------------->
>
<snip...> (A LOT of overhead-making rubbish deleted)
A 4Kbyte message, with only 11 R-lines, to transport 8 lines of text.
This should not be more than 80 chars * 19 lines = approx. 1.6Kbytes.
(2.4 Kbytes rubbish is sent...)
A lot of Java-script-lines, and html-tags that is producing extra size,
and make the message difficult to read.
A lot of overhead to transport 8 lines of text.
Why use html in packet-messages at all.
If you use it on the LOCAL server, ok -no problem.
But it isn't a good thing to use in messages that you want everyone to
read.
It is absolutely not a good thing if the message is forwarded on a HF-link.
Isn't ordinary ascii useble ?
73 de SM3LKS
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
