| |
SM7UZI > BPQ 17.01.99 23:31l 41 Lines 1762 Bytes #-10139 (0) @ WW
BID : SM7UZI4640
Read: SP6VXT GUEST
Subj: Re: RE: BPQ SELF-INSTALLER
Path: DB0AAB<DB0ZKA<DB0ABH<DB0SRS<DB0MW<DB0ERF<DB0SHG<DB0CEL<DB0EWB<DB0HB<
DB0HRO<OZ4BOX<OZ3BOS<OZ3PAC<OZ6BBS<SK7WX<SK7IQ
Sent: 990117/2029Z @:SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU #:63088 [Malmö] $:SM7UZI4640 FBB7.00
From: SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
To : BPQ@WW
>Quoting:
>> From: SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
>> To : BPQ@WW
>......
>> If you want to use kiss are there also other packet drivers that is
>> better than bpq like tfx2.8, agw, tfkiss etc.
>
>If tfx2.8, AGW, tfkiss, etc use KISS better than BPQ, why can't FlexNet
>use KISS better than BPQ?????
This is the reason:
"6PACK provides some advantages over KISS, most notably the ability to
transmit real time data and thus the ability to implement the channel access
algorithm in the PC."
>What node software runs with tfx2.8, AGW, tfkiss, etc?
No, but there are nodes usable with kiss.
>Allowing some users to use KISS with FlexNet would not prevent others
>using 6pack.
It would probably make the whole flexnetnetwork less good!
>Because 6pack is better than KISS we are told we cannot use
>KISS with FlexNet, but must use BPQ, AGW, tfx2.8, tfkiss, etc.
No!
You can use hostmode, like wa8ded host, that is often better than kiss!
But not always, it depends on the firmware how good the packet driver used is.
.a&$a. .a&$a. .a&$$$$$$$$$$&a. .a&$a. Anders Lageras
$$$$$$ $$$$$$ $$$$$$$' `$$$$$$ $$$$$$ Lund Sweden JO65PQ
$' `$$ $$$$$$ `ý$$$$$s,s$$$$$ý $$$$$$ AARS Member No. 81
$s,s$$ $$$$$$ a$$$$$$ý $$' `$ Packet:
73 de SM7-$$$$$$ $$$$$$ a$$$$$$ý $$s,s$ SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
$$$$$$ $$' `$ a$$$$$$ý $$$$$$ E-mail: anders.lageras@usa.net
$$$$$$a$$s,s$ a$$$' `$$$$$$&a. $$$$$$ ICQ#: 5161379
$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$s,s$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$ Homepage:
`ý&$$$$$$$$ý' `ý&$$$$$$$$$$$ý' `ý&$ý' http://www.visitweb.com/uzi/
o==|=====-
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
