| |
VK3KJC > BPQ 13.01.99 11:44l 24 Lines 735 Bytes #-10144 (0) @ WW
BID : DF0126VK3KJC
Read: DB1RAS GUEST
Subj: RE: BPQ VS FLEXNET
Path: DB0AAB<DB0MWS<DB0RBS<DB0LX<DB0ZKA<DB0ABH<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<OK0POK<9A0YRB<
PP5BLU<HA3PG<WB0TAX<VK3BBS<VK3KAY
Sent: 990112/0242Z @:VK3KAY.#WEV.VIC.AUS.OC #:42419 [WENDOUREE] FBB7.00g
From: VK3KJC@VK3KAY.#WEV.VIC.AUS.OC
To : BPQ@WW
Quoting:
> From: SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
> To : BPQ@WW
......
> The problem is that kantronics doesn't support their tncs and the users
> of them with the needed software, and the packet users will suffer. And
> possible also kantronics, but the amateur radio equipment is probably a
> small part of their business.
On the other hand, perhaps the problem is that the software (FlexNet) does
not support the popular hardware.
Does the 6pack code for the TNC2 and clones allow the TNC to switch
between 6pack and other modes, or does it result in the TNC being modified
to disable all other modes?
Cheers - Ken, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
Message timed: 13:31 on 12 Jan 99
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
