| |
PY3SS > BPQ 12.01.99 23:30l 49 Lines 1402 Bytes #-10145 (0) @ WW
BID : 4103_PY3SS
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: bpq selfinstaller.
Path: DB0AAB<DB0FSG<DB0SL<DB0RGB<DB0MAK<OK0PKL<OK0PAD<OK0PPL<OK0POK<9A0YRB<
PP5BLU<PY3KW<PY3SS
Sent: 990112/1459Z @:PY3SS.RS.BRA.SA #:4103 DOS_FBB7.00g $:4103_PY3SS
From: PY3SS@PY3SS.RS.BRA.SA
To : BPQ@WW
>
>>Come with some GOOD arguments.
>Come with some GOOD argument for using bpq instead of flexnet or any other
>GOOD node!
>
My GOOD argument : BPQ is the ONLY driver that runs stable here.
I'm NOT speaking of node features, just as a packet driver.
Have tried TFPCX, TFX and TFEMU+FlexNet+USCC/XSCC. All of them crash.
BPQ is the BETTER packet driver ever made. Netrom is another issue.
>The packet driver part of bpq is less good than to use anothe packet driver,
>like tf2.7 or tfx.
But is the only that doesn't crash here. Sometime FlexNet will improve.
>>
>>You are the first to tell us that it runs on 8086 and newer computers.
>>Have you tried it on these computers ?
>Not on a 8088.
>But on a 286 with baycom modems, and terminal program loaded at the same time
>and that worked just fine.
Try running that on a Pentium under Windows ..........
>
>But the computers isnt a problem, old 386es and 486 computers can you get
>cheap.
>To get a old comptuer and a uscc card is as cheap as a tnc.
>And on amy locations are to slow comptuers ued for bbs and node operations, if
>they got separate comptuer for the node would that jsut be good.
Yes, FlexNet needs TWO computers, one for it and the other for the BBS.
BPQ doesn't !
Best 73 de Marcelo __o
PY3SS@PY3SS.RS.BRA.SA _`\-\,
________________________(_)/ (_)__
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
