| |
PY3SS > BPQ 08.01.99 15:41l 57 Lines 1656 Bytes #-10150 (0) @ WW
BID : 1390_PY3SS
Read: DH6BB DB1RAS GUEST
Subj: Re: bpq vs flexnet
Path: DB0AAB<DB0MWS<DB0RBS<DB0LX<DB0ZKA<DB0ABH<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<OK0PHL<SP6KBL<
SP6YCU<SR3BLS<SR3DZG<SR9DIP<SR9ZAA<PP5BLU<PY3KW<PY3SS
Sent: 990107/1139Z @:PY3SS.RS.BRA.SA #:1390 DOS_FBB7.00g $:1390_PY3SS
From: PY3SS@PY3SS.RS.BRA.SA
To : BPQ@WW
>
>From: SM7UZI@SK7IQ.MALMOE.M.SWE.EU
>To : BPQ@WW
>
>>Yes, the so called "BUG" in BPQ allows me to run it under W95 without problem.
>>The "bugfree" FlexNet and that "thing" called "TFEMU" don't allow that.
>That you are forced to use tfeum is a problem, but if you give it buffer
>enough 28-29kb doesn't is usually cause any major problems.
>Also flexnet works better with large buffers.
>
>Programs that could use the flexnet interface direct without tfeum should be
>made.
Well, ok. No problem. I'll wait for the next FBB version.
>>Even XSCC and USCC drivers didn't. I have tried all but to no avail.
>>
>>Try running FLEXNET + FBB + NETSCAPE + some other software on the same machine
>>under W95 to see the problems with FlexNet SCC drivers.
>I have tried to run flexnet under win95 with out any problems.
>I used qemm9 as memmanager to get any free memory over for other applications
>and not the scc driver, but with other drivers, and with out the "flexnet
>control center" but any way. And there where no such problems.
Flexnet runs under W95 here. But it crashes when you run Netscape, etc...
>Your problem is probably not only caused by flexnet it is also your set up of
>win95, other sfotware etc.
Maybe, but BPQ doesn't bother AT ALL, even running 8 or more programs in W95.
>
>But the most stable system do you get if you run a node on a separate
>computer.
>
Yes, you are right. As I have said before.
The good old BPQ doesn't have that requisite.
Best 73 de Marcelo __o
PY3SS@PY3SS.RS.BRA.SA _`\-\,
________________________(_)/ (_)__
mark@plug-in.com.br
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
