| |
G0FTD > BPQ 01.01.99 21:41l 31 Lines 1058 Bytes #-10159 (0) @ WW
BID : 05949
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: BPQ installer.
Path: DB0AAB<DB0MWS<DB0RBS<DB0SAU<DB0PRT<DB0LX<DB0CZ<DB0LJ<DB0ACH<DB0PKE<
DB0ACC<DB0SM<PI8DAZ<PI8GCB<PI8WFL<PI8VNW<GB7PMB<GB7MAX<GB7PZT<GB7GLO<
GB7BNM<GB7HPH<GB7VRB<GB7SXE
Sent: 981231/2312Z @:GB7SXE.#38.GBR.EU #:35837 [Hastings] $:05949
From: G0FTD@GB7SXE.#38.GBR.EU
To : BPQ@WW
G4VWL said -
> On multi-user radio channels, where perhaps only 20% of users may be
> under the control of a DAMA Master, dynamically adjusting parameters
> with everyone politely waiting their turn to be polled may not
> necessarily be the best solution.
Waiting your turn as in DAMA I dont have a problem with.
> TCPIP users are well-aware of the "back-off until you go to sleep"
>phenomenon.
This would happen in Flexnet, and I totally agree with John.
Having also used (and do use tcpip) I >HATE< this effect.
Thats why I prefer AX25 - you either have a link or you dont.
I see no advantage in being able to hold a link and yet still only have
a trifling throughput ! (which is what Flexnet would achieve).
And besides, if we do want this effect why bother using the AX25 network
when tcpip has had it from day one ;)
ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿
³ 73 de Andy @ GB7SXE.#38.GBR.EU ³
ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
