| |
G7VIT > BPQ 02.04.98 09:47l 30 Lines 1234 Bytes #-10437 (0) @ EU
BID : 6B0075G7VIT
Read: DH6BB DB1RAS GUEST SQ9DHS
Subj: BPQ and Flexnet
Path: DB0AAB<DB0PV<OE2XOM<OE5XBL<DB0WGS<OE3XSR<OE1XAB<OE3XPR<OE3XPR<HA1VH<
HA5OB<HA3PG<PP5BLU<PU3AKM<PY3KW<PY3SS<ZZ3AFR<PU1AKA<KE4HSB<KE4HSB<
KB4FEA<GB7GUR<GB7LWB<GB7KET
Sent: 980318/1821Z @:GB7KET.#27.GBR.EU #:17858 [Kettering] FBB5.15c $:6B0075G7V
From: G7VIT@GB7KET.#27.GBR.EU
To : BPQ@GBR
I recently started "experimenting" with Sally running over BPQ and Winpack
running over Flexnet (also BCT - Flex version of Baycom1.6 under dos).
I would be interested to hear which of the two, if either, is superior to
the other. I feel that Flexnet may be better in Central Europe/Germany
where it is more widely established. I like its modular approach and its
adaptive nature which needs only limited parameter setting. Also, as a
TCP/IP user under dos and linux its more robust routing propeties would
seem to be an advantage.
Being still relatively new to packet I would be interested in the views of
those more experienced than me.
I am posting this message to the FLEXNET forum to throw the net as widely
as possible.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
: 73 de Eric :
: G7VIT@GB7KET.#27.GBR.EU :
: g7vit@g7vit [44.131.29.95] :
: Message timed at 18:20 local time :
: 18 Mar 98 :
: Using WinpackV6.3 (registered) :
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
