OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FHN

[JN59NK Nuernberg]

 Login: GUEST





  
DF3VI  > AMRVIC   02.05.05 14:19l 11 Lines 519 Bytes #999 (30) @ WW
BID : 25FDB0II_01U
Read: DG5YM GUEST
Subj: Re: ACA discussion paper raises options for BPL
Path: DB0FHN<DB0THA<DB0ERF<DB0ROF<DB0ACH<DB0PRA<DB0II
Sent: 050502/1211z @:DB0II.#NRW.DEU.EU [BCM M'Gladbach] obcm1.06b51 LT:030
From: DF3VI @ DB0II.#NRW.DEU.EU (Patrick)
To:   AMRVIC @ WW
Reply-To: DF3VI @ DB0OVN.#NRW.DEU.EU
X-Info: Sent with login password

The ACA should ask theirself if they would allow any data provider to put up 
a megawatt transmitter in every major city and allocate them the whole 
spectrum from 0 to 30 MHz. If the answer is "NO" then the same answer has to
be given to BPL, because it makes no difference if you put 1 MW into one
antenna, or put 1 W each into a million of antennas (= unshielded cables).

73, Patrick


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 15.09.2025 23:52:02lGo back Go up