| |
VK5IE > WOEFUL 04.08.03 23:42l 38 Lines 1377 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 12337-VK5IE
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: G6KUI vs VK6BE
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0AR<VK6HGR<ZL2TZE<VK5UJ<VK5BRC<VK5SPG
Sent: 030804/2126Z @:VK5SPG.#ADL.#SA.AUS.OC #:39719 [Adelaide] $:12337-VK5IE
From: VK5IE@VK5SPG.#ADL.#SA.AUS.OC
To : WOEFUL@WW
[¯¯¯ TST HOST 1.43c, UTC diff:0, Local time: Tue Aug 05 09:07:36 2003 ®®®]
Don't thank me Pete, you have taken my bulletin out of context.
>Thank you Bill for confirming that this was not the first time that VK6BE
>had used swear words on packet - his HomeBBS Sysop doesn't believe me, maybe
>he will believe you.
Apart from once appending part of a bulletin from a VK8 (ex G ) I have never
know VK6BE to USE foul language on packet.
And Yes John VK6JY was 100% correct in what he wrote in his bulletin.
>Bill VK5IE wrote ( amongst other things )......
>}
>} So if you're going to take action, do it against the original perpetrator.
A motor mouth VK8 , NOT VK6BE.
>Well in the case that I am concerned with VK6BE *IS* the original perpetrator.
Wrong again 6 does not make 8.
By the way, as a sysop at least, I would have thought that if you are going
to make allegations that at least you keep the evidence to substantiate
your allegations.
Not a very snart move to delete the evidence either before or after making
the allegations.
>VK-land , please clean up your act.
Convince the VK8 to return to G land and it is cleaned up.
73' de BILL - VK5IE @ VK5SPG
*** Using TSTHOST V1.43c ***
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
