| |
VK2ICQ > WOEFUL 03.08.03 13:12l 38 Lines 1158 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 890008VK2ICQ
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: VK packet "running on empty"?
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0AR<N2BQF<W4JAX<VK4TUB<VK4TX<VK2YDN<
VK2PYU<VK2TV
Sent: 030803/0435Z @:VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC #:22223 [Kempsey, QF68JX] $:890008VK
From: VK2ICQ@VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC
To : WOEFUL@WW
Oh really. Is this what VK hams are like? Oh really? Or are you just
staring in the mirror?
Just select the negative and charactorise us all this way. You must be a
very clever man.
Cheers,
Dave
VK2ICQ
> Regrettable though it is, I've suggested that UK amateurs on packet should
> put an end to this, not engage with vexatious VK amateurs, and consider
> whether to even send bulls to ww at all. Many are receptive to that.
>
> UK amateurs need to be aware that if they upset VK's, there's a real
> probability - not a theoretical possibility, that VK's will report you
> to the RA. Do you want yourself and the RA to be jerked around from
> 10,000 miles away by those who are in no place to judge you, and who
> aren't themselves subject to regulation?
>
> There's sufficient critical mass on UK packet for us to stand alone and
> "pull up the drawbridge", which would be a shame, but we must distance
> ourselves from this toxic culture which presently pervades packet like a
> virus.
73 - Dave, VK2ICQ @ VK2TV
Message timed: 13:55 on 2003-Aug-03
Message sent using WinPack V6.80
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
