| |
GM0CSZ > ARRL 01.12.04 11:49l 34 Lines 1252 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : ED1771GM0CSZ
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: The ARRL Letter. Nov 5. 2004
Path: DB0FHN<DB0RGB<OK0PPL<DB0RES<ON0AR<GB7CIP<GB7CRV<GB7FUR<GB7IOM<GB7SAN<
GB7INV<GB7INV<GB7NOS
Sent: 041129/2129Z @:GB7NOS.#76.GBR.EU #:20002 [Golspie] FBB7.00i $:ED1771GM0CS
From: GM0CSZ@GB7NOS.#76.GBR.EU
To : ARRL@WW
G0FTD wrote:-
>
> I wonder if the FCC are aware of the experimental amateur beacons using
> nano and microwatt outputs being received upto a thousand or so miles
> away ? The same sort of leakage level I'd expect from a BPL radiator.
>
> Oh hang on a minute ... technical reasons shouldn't interfere (pardon
> the pun) with the Capitalist dream eh ;-)
>
> Still us Brits can't gloat too much as our OFCOM are pretty much the
> same. That's why RADIO was controlled by the Dept of TRADE and INDUSTRY,
> never mind the principles of engineering but just keep changing the
> rules so that consumers are forced to spend money on new equipment.
=============================
It is highly unlikely that BPL (or PLT as it is called in the UK) will be
introduced in the UK because of its interference potential to HF comms as
recognised by RA (now OFCOM).......so in the UK it is NOT 'pretty much the
same' as in the USA.
73 - Frank , GM0CSZ @ GB7NOS.#76.GBR.EU
Inver by Tain , IV20 1RX Scotland UK Loc: IO87AT
e-mail: gm0csz.kn6wh@ntlworld.com
They say the future is bright ; 2 of its challenges being RENEWABLE ENERGY
and LINUX.
Message timed: 15:44 UTC on 29 Nov 2004
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
